[Bug 1842651] Re: Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 network interfaces don't get renamed by 70-persistent-network.rules

2019-09-10 Thread pirlo
237-3ubuntu10.29 - works for me (Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS, 4.15.0-51-generic) Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842651 Title: Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 t

[Bug 1842651] Re: Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 network interfaces don't get renamed by 70-persistent-network.rules

2019-09-04 Thread pirlo
A lot of dependencies and the new naming scheme is too unreliable because multiple servers are being served. with 70-persistent-net.rules we can trust the interfaces get the correct device name we need (until now). If something like that is broken during a release change (18.04 to 19.04) it's ok

[Bug 1842651] Re: Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 network interfaces don't get renamed by 70-persistent-network.rules

2019-09-04 Thread pirlo
Same Problem with version .28! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842651 Title: Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 network interfaces don't ge

[Bug 1842651] [NEW] Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 network interfaces don't get renamed by 70-persistent-network.rules

2019-09-04 Thread pirlo
Public bug reported: Since the latest update from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 and systemd_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 and systemd_237-3ubuntu10.26 the renaming of network interfaces by /etc/udev/rules/70-persistent-network.rules does not work. /etc/udev/rules/70-persistent-network.rules:

[Bug 282186] Re: HP Photosmart 2610 top first cm not printed

2019-08-28 Thread pirlo
You can download the driver for the HP Deskjet 2630 in : https://file- hpdrivers.com/hp-photosmart/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282186 Title: HP Photosmart 2610 top first cm not pr

[Bug 1367286] Re: package irqbalance 1.0.6-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 102

2015-09-10 Thread pirlo
D20: deferred_configure '/etc/init/irqbalance.conf' (= '/etc/init/irqbalance.conf') useredited=-1 distedited=-1 what=2 start: Job is already running: irqbalance invoke-rc.d: initscript irqbalance, action "start" failed. dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Paketes irqbalance (--install): Unterpro

[Bug 1367286] Re: package irqbalance 1.0.6-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 102

2015-09-10 Thread pirlo
manual stopping of irqbalance before starting the update did it for me! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1367286 Title: package irqbalance 1.0.6-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess

[Bug 1477395] [NEW] bindgraph str2time error - can't parse logfile date format

2015-07-22 Thread pirlo
Public bug reported: bindgraph does not start - I am getting the following error message:  * Starting DNS Statistics /usr/sbin/bindgraph.pl Prototype mismatch: sub Parse::Syslog::str2time ($$$) vs ($$$

[Bug 1477395] Re: bindgraph str2time error - can't parse logfile date format

2015-07-22 Thread pirlo
Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS bind9 1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.3 bindgraph 0.2a-5.1 libparse-syslog-perl1.10-2ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:/

[Bug 981789] Re: Postgrey does not stop

2012-06-04 Thread pirlo
the problem seem to be that start-stop-daemon uses /proc/pid/stat to identifiy the process - since ubuntu 12.04 stat changed a little bit! this ist from ubuntu 11.10: root@server:~# cat /proc/1816/stat 1816 (postgrey) S 1 1816 1816 0 -1 4202816 1088 0 7 0 0 5 0 0 20 0 1 0 78655 12664832 2025 4294

[Bug 981789] Re: Postgrey does not stop

2012-06-04 Thread pirlo
same problem here on multiple 12.04 systems: root@server:~# cat /var/run/postgrey.pid 1302 root@server:~# service postgrey restart * Stopping postfix greylisting daemon postgrey [ OK ] * Starting postfix greylisting daemon postgrey

[Bug 1001078] Re: package netbase 4.47ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2012-05-17 Thread pirlo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001078 Title: package netbase 4.47ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

[Bug 1001078] [NEW] package netbase 4.47ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2012-05-17 Thread pirlo
Public bug reported: got an error on upgrade from 11.10 to 12.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: netbase 4.47ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-19.33-generic-pae 3.0.27 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-19-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: i386 Date:

[Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7

2011-07-26 Thread pirlo
btw tried to install printer with konica minolta bizhub 283 driver from this website: http://download6.konicaminolta.eu/konmin/public/&&BEU&DE&sw&0&&&0&&0&&0 (Druckertreiber PCL6PCL6 driver (WHQL) for KONICA MINOLTA bizhub 423/363/283/2231.1.2.0 2010-06-01) -- You received this bug

[Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7

2011-07-26 Thread pirlo
Same problem here with Ubuntu Lucid 10.04.3 and samba 3.4.7 - 32 bit driver works like charm, 64 bit driver gives the message with 0x00d8. one year is a very very long time for a bug! if you have hunderts of computers you don't really want to user lpt oder ipp printing with local drivers