I have the same chipset (ASUS M3N78-VM) and my DVD drive reports 1.5 but my 2
Seagate drives report 3.0.
Maybe the chipset doesn't support RAID in 3.0 mode?
--
SATA GeForce 8200 showing 1.5 instead of 3.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317882
You received this bug notification because you
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gparted
Gparted 0.3.5 is unable to create partition greater than 1TB (or 1048575
MiB). Selecting a value of 104876 MiB will cause the error.
This has been corrected in Gparted 0.3.7
Recommend that Gparted be upgraded to 0.3.9 as other errors have been
On Jan 31, 2008 2:33 AM, Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
update this package, too (and blatantly ignore that opera won't work
with the new flash version either).
That's Ok, Opera should be working on a fix anyways, no?
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
I have been following this thread for a while and to be honest it does
not seem like it will be fixed in Gutsy.
Someone seems to think that Konqueror people will be to inconvenienced
because the latest release of flash requires XEmbed (someone correct
me if I am wrong).
The way I see it is: This
Could we not also:
A: Reconfigure the package so that question is high priority
or
B: Reconfigure the package so that it downloads and extracts the
proper flash archive?
(I know that the archive is larger but if you don't have broadband do
you really want flash?)
-Chris
On Jan 3, 2008 1:20
On Dec 12, 2007 11:23 PM, Tom Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
working systems. Mike Melanson of Adobe seems very receptive on mailing
lists so perhaps he could be contacted by the maintainer and help to get
a working copy of the flash plugin hosted by Adobe to allow the original
package to work
Adobe updated the flash plugin. Due to their license, we must
download and install their file.
This breaks the Gutsy package.
We have TWO choices:
1) Don't update the package and have a broken package that no-one can
use (aside from the more technically minded)
2) Update the package and have a
On Dec 11, 2007 11:54 AM, Gonzhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vinay Augustine schrieb:
I sent a patch a while ago to ask the user whether he wants to still
install even if md5sums did not match. Is this acceptable and why not, why?
Here is the patch again.
I believe that would be ok if:
1)
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree
Adobe has once again updated their flash player to 9.0 r115 (as of Dec. 3, 2007)
The new file causes a checksum mismatch again.
The .deb from debian unstable (sid) does install the latest version correctly.
The flashplugin-nonfree
