[Bug 1011371] Re: mysql 5.5.24, 5.1.63, 5.0.x security update tracking bug

2012-06-11 Thread sseitz
Regarding #2: You're right. I've tried on identical 12.04 LTS 64bit. Vulnurable on Xeon E5654 Not vulnurable on Xeon E5345 Both machines are paravirtualizes Xen DomU, so it looks like the system is vulnurable by the availability of sse4 only. It looks like the existence of Xen

[Bug 1011602] Re: mysql login possible without knowing password

2012-06-11 Thread sseitz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1011371 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011371 Forgot to add the original post which made me aware of the bug: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q2/493 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1011371] Re: mysql 5.5.24, 5.1.63, 5.0.x security update tracking bug

2012-06-11 Thread sseitz
Regarding #2: You're right. I've tried on identical 12.04 LTS 64bit. Vulnurable on Xeon E5654 Not vulnurable on Xeon E5345 Both machines are paravirtualizes Xen DomU, so it looks like the system is vulnurable by the availability of sse4 only. It looks like the existence of Xen

[Bug 997471] [NEW] package linux-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/bin/perf« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket linux-tools-common 3.2.0-24.38 ist

2012-05-09 Thread sseitz
Public bug reported: Sorry, I don't have further information. It's just after upgrading from oneiric to precise, my desktop startup with a Problem occured Messagewindow. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: linux-base (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Bug 997471] Re: package linux-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/bin/perf« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket linux-tools-common 3.2.0-24.38 ist

2012-05-09 Thread sseitz
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997471 Title: package linux-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/bin/perf« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket

[Bug 965371] Re: HTTPS requests fail on some sites on Ubuntu 12.04

2012-04-02 Thread sseitz
Regarding #12 I'ld also suggest, to wait for an upstream solution. The side-effects of non-working SSL are far too big to be ignored or being addressed to the other end of the SSL connection. One can't argue to a customer running webshops, that paypal has an invalid implementation of TLS. --

[Bug 968085] [NEW] 1.0.1-2ubuntu2 client side connect problem

2012-03-29 Thread sseitz
Public bug reported: After updating a precise amd64 server from libssl1.0.0 (1.0.0g-1ubuntu1) to libssl1.0.0 (1.0.1-2ubuntu2) by regular apt-get update/upgrade, outgoing https connections stopped working stable. This depends on the target to connect to and at least affects php5-curl, curl,

[Bug 968085] Re: 1.0.1-2ubuntu2 client side connect problem

2012-03-29 Thread sseitz
** Attachment added: 1.0.0g Working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968085/+attachment/2959334/+files/libssl_1.0.0g-1ubuntu1_WORKING_Example.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 968085] Re: 1.0.1-2ubuntu2 client side connect problem

2012-03-29 Thread sseitz
Sorry, here's the Output of the NOT working 1.0.1-2ubuntu2 ** Attachment added: 1.0.1-2ubuntu2 not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/968085/+attachment/2959340/+files/libssl_1.0.1-2ubuntu2_NOT_WORKING_Example.txt -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 912308] [NEW] ext2 boot partition not recognized by linux-virtual

2012-01-05 Thread sseitz
Public bug reported: The default LVM Layout used by precise installer creates an ext2 /boot Partition. When using the linux-virtual kernel, the system is unable to mount /boot from fstab since there's no ext2 support. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: linux-virtual 3.2.0.7.7

[Bug 912308] Re: ext2 boot partition not recognized by linux-virtual

2012-01-05 Thread sseitz
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912308 Title: ext2 boot partition not recognized by linux-virtual To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 810182] Re: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV

2011-10-25 Thread sseitz
Regarding #21. Thank You guys for trying to solve this issue, but I'm afraid I do not have to different kinds of GPU at that machine. Indeed, it's a quad monitor setup on two identical GeForce 7300 LE using Oneiric's propriatery nvidia 280.13. Just ask, if you need more logfiles, gdb outputs,

[Bug 810182] Re: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV

2011-10-12 Thread sseitz
Thank's thomas, i've done the backtraces with the original nux-tools and additionally with the nux-tools-dbgsym. gdb output is attached. ** Attachment added: gdb output nux-tools oneiric

[Bug 810182] Re: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV

2011-10-12 Thread sseitz
regarding #19, see attachment. ** Attachment added: gdb output nux-tools-dbgsym oneiric https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/810182/+attachment/2538460/+files/gdb-unity_support_test-dbgsym.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 810182] Re: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV

2011-10-10 Thread sseitz
@Jay Taoko Sorry for the late response, I don't know how to do a stack trace w/ symbols. gdb --args /usr/lib/nux/unity_support_test -p shows Starting program: /usr/lib/nux/unity_support_test -p [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.

[Bug 810182] Re: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV

2011-10-06 Thread sseitz
On latest oneiric I've got following result: /usr/lib/nux/unity_support_test -p Segmentation fault (core dumped) NVidia driver is 280.13, glxinfo is attached as file. ** Attachment added: glxinfo output

[Bug 368491] Re: Cannot mount partition on iSCSI LUN

2009-05-23 Thread sseitz
Just for the records: This bug is reproducable since Ubuntu Gutsty and renders Ubuntu virtually useless for Virtualization Servers with HA iSCSI connectivity. -- Cannot mount partition on iSCSI LUN https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368491 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 368491] Re: Cannot mount partition on iSCSI LUN

2009-05-23 Thread sseitz
Just for the records: This bug is reproducable since Ubuntu Gutsty and renders Ubuntu virtually useless for Virtualization Servers with HA iSCSI connectivity. -- Cannot mount partition on iSCSI LUN https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368491 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 239420] [NEW] eog initial size on triple head configuration

2008-06-12 Thread sseitz
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eog eog obviously starts up with about 80% of screen width. If the screen is e.g. 3840 x 1024, eog starts with 2880x2065+480+46 which is really annoying as one has to move and resize the window (not necessarily the shown image) a few times to

[Bug 239420] Re: eog initial size on triple head configuration

2008-06-12 Thread sseitz
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15233092/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15233093/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15233094/ProcStatus.txt -- eog initial

Re: [Bug 239420] Re: eog initial size on triple head configuration

2008-06-12 Thread sseitz
Pedro Villavicencio schrieb: thanks for your report, may you forward this upstream since you have that configuration? The bug has been filed upstream as suggested. Thanks for your response! -- eog initial size on triple head configuration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239420 You received