[Bug 606238] Re: synaptic touchpad not recognized on dell latitude e6510 and others

2012-09-18 Thread useResa
@bgamari Thank you for your clear instructions in comment #155. They really helped. Had to change a little though. Instead of your last two commands I used: cp /boot/config-$(uname -r) . make oldconfig Next I followed the instructions in comment #139 cd driver/input/mouse make -C

[Bug 606238] Re: synaptic touchpad not recognized on dell latitude e6510 and others

2012-09-18 Thread useResa
@bgamari In reaction to my previous comment (#160), I have succeeded to make the change persistant. I have firstly backup the original psmouse.ko sudo cp /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse.ko ~/backup directory/psmouse.ko.backup Next I have copied the psmouse.ko

[Bug 606238] Re: synaptic touchpad not recognized on dell latitude e6510 and others

2012-09-17 Thread useResa
I have been reading positive comments on getting the touchpad working on Dell Latitude E6430 with the solution as provided by pfoo in comment #139. Unfortunately I have (too) little knowledge of git to know how to implement the solution. I have tried both: git clone

[Bug 111000] Re: Keyboard doesn't work within a java applet (Sun Secure Global Destop)

2012-09-05 Thread useResa
I am running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 64 bit version and have been experiencing the same issue. It seems that I can never input keyboard strokes and/or mouse clicks in Unity. In cinnamon (which I have installed as an additional DE) it sometimes is possible but also in this environment it does fail

[Bug 1037250] [NEW] installation failure at grub step, dell latitude e6430

2012-08-15 Thread useResa
Public bug reported: At the end of installation grub failed to install on /dev/sda and /dev/sda1 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ubiquity 2.10.16 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5

[Bug 1037250] Re: installation failure at grub step, dell latitude e6430

2012-08-15 Thread useResa
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037250 Title: installation failure at grub step, dell latitude e6430 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1037250] Re: installation failure at grub step, dell latitude e6430

2012-08-15 Thread useResa
I installed Ubuntu from an USB stick that was created with unetbootin. During the second trial of the installation I looked at the advanced partition editor and noticed that by default grub was going to be installed on /dev/sdb. Changing this to /dev/sda resulted in a succesful installation. So

[Bug 1016165] Re: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘do_mmap’]

2012-07-27 Thread useResa
Although I also experienced the same issue again with kernel 3.5.0-6, something has changed. Before this kernel I did not have full screen capabilities, currently I have. Even after reboots. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1016165] Re: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘do_mmap’]

2012-07-20 Thread useResa
No change with kernel 3.5.0-5 and VBox 4.1.18 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016165 Title: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build

[Bug 1021613] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_ui_manager_new_merge_id()

2012-07-06 Thread useResa
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021613 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_ui_manager_new_merge_id() To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1016165] Re: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘do_mmap’]

2012-07-06 Thread useResa
Same error message appears with the latest kernel version (3.5.0-3) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016165 Title: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module

[Bug 1016165] Re: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘do_mmap’]

2012-06-27 Thread useResa
Situation is still present in the 4.1.18 version of VirtualBox and the latest version of the kernel. $ uname -r 3.5.0-2-generic Error reported when installing the guest additions: Building the VirtualBox Guest Additions kernel modules The headers for the current running kernel were not found. If

[Bug 1016229] [NEW] virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build

2012-06-21 Thread useResa
Public bug reported: Error was reported during an aptitude full-upgrade of an installation of Ubuntu 12.10 in VirtualBox (host is Ubuntu 12.04). It may have to do with the fact that this afternoon VirtualBox was upgraded to release 4.1.18. However, not sure about this. ProblemType: Package

[Bug 1016229] Re: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build

2012-06-21 Thread useResa
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016229 Title: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1016229] Re: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build

2012-06-21 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: /var/lib/dkms/vboxguest/4.1.18/build/make.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1016229/+attachment/3199422/+files/make.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1016229] Re: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build

2012-06-21 Thread useResa
During the upgrade the following errors where indicated: Setting up linux-image-extra-3.5.0-1-generic (3.5.0-1.1) ... Running depmod. update-initramfs: deferring update (hook will be called later) Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d. run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms 3.5.0-1-generic

[Bug 946124] Re: [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gnome_rr_screen_get_dpms_mode()

2012-06-08 Thread useResa
I encountered this bug when I quit the installer during in installation of the quantal-desktop-i386.iso in VirtualBox on an Ubuntu 12.04 host. As also indicated in comment #7 also to me it was indicated that bug #1008818 was the issue. Note 1: The reason to quit the installer was the fact that it

[Bug 683249] Re: cant connect to rdp or vnc via ssh tunnel in version 8.0

2012-05-03 Thread useResa
I recently upgraded to Ubuntu 12.04 and, as the OP, have been using Remmina for several releases now to connect to remote servers. With the latest upgrade I have been faced with the issue as described: Unable to connect to RDP via ssh while the settings are identical to before the upgrade. $

[Bug 683249] Re: cant connect to rdp or vnc via ssh tunnel in version 8.0

2012-05-03 Thread useResa
Update to my previous comment: In my case it turned out that an expired password was the cause for the error message. Once changed: By connecting to the server by another way and changing the password in the remmina connection properties it connects without issues -- You received this bug

[Bug 976805] Re: lubuntu 12.04 incorrect nm-applet icon

2012-05-02 Thread useResa
Mark thanks for finding the actual issue. Your (temporary) solution, as provided in comment #4, solved it for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/976805 Title: lubuntu 12.04 incorrect

[Bug 328174] Re: Uninstalling sun-java6-* does not remove the binfmts-entry for jar

2012-04-28 Thread useResa
I have just upgraded from Ubuntu 11.10 to Ubuntu 12.04. One of the things I did after the upgrade is change over to Java 7 by using the PPA as described on the WEB UPD8 page (see http://www.webupd8.org/2012/01/install-oracle-java-jdk-7-in-ubuntu-via.html). During the installation I noticed the

[Bug 728825] Re: Eclipse cannot start: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no swt-gtk-3557 or swt-gtk

2012-04-27 Thread useResa
I am on 12.04 32-bit and encountered the same issue. Resolved by using the suggestion as made in comment #9 in Bug #975560 $ rm -rf ~/.swt/lib/linux/x86 $ ln -s /usr/lib/jni ~/.swt/lib/linux/x86 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 976805] [NEW] lubuntu 12.04 incorrect nm-applet icon

2012-04-08 Thread useResa
Public bug reported: Yesterday I upgraded my lubuntu installation to release 12.04 by modifying the /etc/apt/sources.list and performing the upgrade. Current situation: $ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu precise

[Bug 976805] Re: lubuntu 12.04 incorrect nm-applet icon

2012-04-08 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: Incorrect nm-applet icon in Lubuntu panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/976805/+attachment/3030723/+files/Lubuntu_Incorrect_Network_Icon.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 831380] Re: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:575: _XReply: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_extra_reply_data_left' failed.

2011-08-22 Thread useResa
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831380 Title: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:575: _XReply:

[Bug 806170] Re: metacity crashed with SIGSEGV in SmcCloseConnection()

2011-08-22 Thread useResa
Received the same error after reboot today in Oneiric (Linux ubuntu- desktop 3.0.0-9-generic #12-Ubuntu SMP Sat Aug 20 18:54:43 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux). Package: metacity Version: 1:2.34.1-1ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 814999] Re: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:515: _XReply: Assertion `!dpy-xcb-reply_data' failed.

2011-07-23 Thread useResa
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814999 Title: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:515: _XReply:

[Bug 804891] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_timer_stop()

2011-07-22 Thread useResa
I am not sure what to make of comment #6. Does this mean that this bug is closed? Fact is indeed that Nautilus did not start correctly and that I have an entirely empty window. However, until today I encounter this every time I use Nautilus for the first time after a reboot. Can someone please

[Bug 804891] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_timer_stop()

2011-07-22 Thread useResa
Thanks for clarifying the situation. I had indeed seen that the bug status was saying Triaged but was confused by the remark of Johannes. Thus I thought it was better to confirm. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 813500] Re: metacity crashed with SIGABRT in __kernel_vsyscall()

2011-07-20 Thread useResa
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/813500 Title: metacity crashed with SIGABRT in __kernel_vsyscall() To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 808508] Re: [oneiric] libindicator6 breaks libindicator3

2011-07-11 Thread useResa
Sebastien thank you for your reply. I fully understand the comment and agree. The main reason for reporting this bug was the fact that I read bug #808009 which is purely focussed on XFCE. My point was to indicate that not only XFCE was touched by the breakage. In future I will not report such

[Bug 808508] [NEW] [oneiric] libindicator6 breaks libindicator3

2011-07-10 Thread useResa
Public bug reported: Last Friday's updates (IIRC) resulted initially in the installation of libindicator6 which in return resulted in the removal of the ubuntu- desktop package. I have left it like this over the weekend hoping that an additional update would resolve this issue. Currently I have

[Bug 808508] Re: libindicator6 breaks libindicator3

2011-07-10 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: Oneiric_No_Indicators.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/808508/+attachment/2201360/+files/Oneiric_No_Indicators.png ** Summary changed: - libindicator6 breaks libindicator3 + [oneiric] libindicator6 breaks libindicator3 -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 804889] Re: unity-2d-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2011-07-04 Thread useResa
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804889 Title: unity-2d-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() To manage notifications about this

[Bug 804330] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_file_query_info()

2011-07-04 Thread useResa
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804330 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_file_query_info() To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 803728] Re: root nautilus file browser segfaults with GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_file_has_prefix: assertion `G_IS_FILE (file)' failed

2011-07-01 Thread useResa
I followed the suggestions as made by Pedro Villavicencio in comment #2. The submitted bug report can be found as bug #804330 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/803728 Title: root

[Bug 712075] Re: [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid

2011-06-22 Thread useResa
I have tried the solution as described by sikkepitje in comment #52 however unfortunately it did not resolve my issue. I am still getting the EDID invalid checksum errors. My hardware is the same as indicated in comment #27 however at the moment I am running oneiric with the 3.0-1-generic

[Bug 771788] Re: nVidia driver activated and apparently being used but reported as not being used by jockey-gtk

2011-05-01 Thread useResa
Opposed to what Forlong states in post #12 I only have nVidia loaded: $ grep drv\.so /var/log/Xorg.0.log [43.835] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so [43.983] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so [47.174] (II) Loading

[Bug 772207] Re: version 173.14.30 is buggy for GeForce FX 5200

2011-04-30 Thread useResa
Same issue in natty with the following graphics card: nVidia Corporation G72M [Quadro NVS 110M/GeForce Go 7300] (rev a1) Driver installed is nvidia-current (Version: 270.41.06-0ubuntu1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 712075] Re: [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid

2011-03-18 Thread useResa
I upgrade to the new kernel 2.6.38-7-generic and also for me the issue is still there. Attached the dmesg with the new kernel. ** Attachment added: dmesg (2011.03.18) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/712075/+attachment/1918752/+files/dmesg_20110318.txt -- You received

[Bug 712075] Re: [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid

2011-03-06 Thread useResa
I am having the same error, both in my Ubuntu 10.10 as well in my Ubuntu 11.04 installation. However, I do not so much have the flickering that is indicated. I am faced with a screen resolution that is stuck on 1024x768. On release 10.10 I was able to retrieve my original screen resolution

[Bug 712075] Re: [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid

2011-03-06 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: dmesg result on my 10.10 installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/712075/+attachment/1889431/+files/dmesg_10.10_20110305.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 712075] Re: [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid

2011-03-06 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: dmesg result on my 11.04 installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/712075/+attachment/1889432/+files/dmesg_11.04_20110305.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 712075] Re: [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid

2011-03-06 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: xorg.conf for 10.10 installation to get 1440x900 resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/712075/+attachment/1889433/+files/xorg.conf_10.10_20110305.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 124373] Re: _cache-open() failed, please report

2010-10-30 Thread useResa
The comments made by missyblouir (#26 to #29) seem not bug related to me. Can these be removed and/or the poster reported? -- _cache-open() failed, please report https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 541492] Re: MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash) (Should KMS be blacklisted?)

2010-09-18 Thread useResa
@sam, I have been running Maverick since Alpha 1. Initially with the bleeding edge X but since Alpha 3 with the default X environment. I have replaced Lucid with Maverick due to this bug and I have to admit that (besides a few bumps) Maverick has been much more stable than Lucid ever was on my

[Bug 633593] Re: Beta i845G no screens found

2010-09-09 Thread useResa
As the OP I have ran into the same issue with the upgrade to kernel 2.6.35-20. I have added, for now, i915.modeset=1 to the boot options in /etc/default/grub which gives me no crashes or black screens on boot up. I will attach the Xorg.0.log from when I encountered the issue. Additionally: $

[Bug 633593] Re: Beta i845G no screens found

2010-09-09 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: Xorg.O.log file when not using i915.modeset=1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/633593/+attachment/1559483/+files/Xorg.0.log_20100908.txt -- Beta i845G no screens found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633593 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 541492] Re: MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash) (Should KMS be blacklisted?)

2010-09-09 Thread useResa
jerrylamos thanks for filing the other bug. I have indicated that I am also affected with the same bug and have added my Xorg.0.log file for reference. -- MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash) (Should KMS be blacklisted?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541492 You received this bug

[Bug 541492] Re: MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash) (Should KMS be blacklisted?)

2010-09-08 Thread useResa
As jerrylamos I am also running Maverick. I have been running it since Alpha 1 on my desktop (Dell Dimension 2400) with an i845G graphics card and was pleased that the intel graphics card issues seemed to have been resolved. However ... experienced exactly the same as jerrylamos that the upgrade

[Bug 541492] Re: MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash) (Should KMS be blacklisted?)

2010-09-08 Thread useResa
Until now Maverick worked fine on my desktop without having to alter the boot options. From comment #223 I understand that something has been altered with the coming of the 2.6.35-20 kernel now resulting in a black screen at startup. Using the i915.modeset=1 indeed solved the issue for me now

[Bug 621076] [NEW] BUG: scheduling while atomic: gnome-panel/1361/0x10000001

2010-08-20 Thread useResa
Public bug reported: This bug appeared after the upgrade from kernel 2.6.35-15-generic to kernel 2.6.35-16-generic. If more information is required, please let me know ProblemType: KernelOops DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: linux-image-2.6.35-16-generic 2.6.35-16.22 Regression: Yes

[Bug 621076] Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic: gnome-panel/1361/0x10000001

2010-08-20 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: AcpiTables.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621076/+attachment/1503508/+files/AcpiTables.txt ** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621076/+attachment/1503509/+files/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt

[Bug 541492] Re: MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash) (Should KMS be blacklisted?)

2010-06-05 Thread useResa
Interesting link and read as provided by Aether (comment #131). Unfortunately Ubuntu does no longer use inittab and I know to little on how to control the startup order. I know it is controlled by the S and the number following it in the /etc/rcX.d (where X represents the runlevel) that is

[Bug 541492] Re: MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash) (Should KMS be blacklisted?)

2010-04-09 Thread useResa
Basically I can only confirm wat has been posted recently. IMHO the i915.modeset=0 option added gives me more headaches than WITHOUT. Without the option I have currently 1 or 2 hard crashes a day, which is not pleasant but I can live with it since my desktop is not my production machine. With

[Bug 545201] Re: [i845] GPU lockup da27380f (PGTBL_ER: 0x00000049)

2010-04-02 Thread useResa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541492 In the Master bug #541492 I read the following: However, I think it's pretty well known at this point that upstream's code is fairly buggered with i845, so if you have that video card, if you have a freeze

[Bug 545201] Re: [i845] GPU lockup da27380f (PGTBL_ER: 0x00000049)

2010-03-27 Thread useResa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541492 Today my system is currently up and running for more than seven and a half hours (not always manned). But have not encountered one single crash! it is looking very hopeful! Thanks Geir for the effort

[Bug 545201] Re: [i845] GPU lockup da27380f (PGTBL_ER: 0x00000049)

2010-03-27 Thread useResa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541492 Sorry Geir ... almost wish I did not post the previous comment. Shortly after my post the system crashed twice :'( I will try and run an apport-collect to see if I can provide information to help you

[Bug 545201] Re: [i845] GPU lockup da27380f (PGTBL_ER: 0x00000049)

2010-03-27 Thread useResa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541492 Sorry ... apport collect did not work You are not the reporter or subscriber of this problem report, or the report is a duplicate or already closed. Please create a new report using apport-bug. -- [i845]

[Bug 545201] Re: [i845] GPU lockup da27380f (PGTBL_ER: 0x00000049)

2010-03-26 Thread useResa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541492 The trial version (2:2.10.903-4-g0c47195.1) gave me more issues than the current official version (2:2.9.1-1ubuntu17). Although the current official version crashes every once in a while, with the trial

[Bug 541492] Re: MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash)

2010-03-26 Thread useResa
Have posted my experiences with the trial version (2:2.10.903-4-g0c47195.1) in my original report, bug #545201 Unfortunately caused more issues than the current official version -- MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541492 You received this bug notification

[Bug 545201] Re: [i845] GPU lockup da27380f (PGTBL_ER: 0x00000049)

2010-03-26 Thread useResa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541492 Hi Geir, I have installed the following package (partial output of aptitude show xserver-xorg-video-intel): Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel State: installed Automatically installed: no Version:

[Bug 545201] Re: [i845] GPU lockup da27380f (PGTBL_ER: 0x00000049)

2010-03-26 Thread useResa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541492 What I can already can confirm is that the NX client works with the package from your repository. The display connection works and I do not get logged out. -- [i845] GPU lockup da27380f (PGTBL_ER:

[Bug 545201] Re: [i845] GPU lockup da27380f (PGTBL_ER: 0x00000049)

2010-03-25 Thread useResa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541492 Have installed (as suggested in bug #541492) xserver-xorg-video intel package version: 2:2.10.903-4-g0c47195.1 Will provide feedback as soon as possible on results -- [i845] GPU lockup da27380f (PGTBL_ER:

[Bug 524942] Re: FATAL: Could not open '/boot/System.map-2.6.32-13-generic': No such file or directory

2010-03-23 Thread useResa
Experiencing the same. Now have packages linux-backports-modules-2.6.32-14-generic and linux-backports-modules-2.6.32-15-generic as residual config in Synaptic. When I try to completely remove these packages I come across the same error message for each of the packages. -- FATAL: Could not

[Bug 545201] [NEW] [i845] GPU lockup da27380f (PGTBL_ER: 0x00000049)

2010-03-23 Thread useResa
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel This bug is most likely a duplicate of bug report #541492 The reason for submitting this report separately is since my initial bug report #529191 was closed due to the fact that updates were provided. This is to confirm that the

[Bug 545201] Re: [i845] GPU lockup da27380f (PGTBL_ER: 0x00000049)

2010-03-23 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41739852/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41739853/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41739854/Dependencies.txt **

[Bug 529191] Re: X freeze - Screen turns black entirely

2010-03-23 Thread useResa
As suggested by you I have filed a new bug report, bug #545201 -- X freeze - Screen turns black entirely https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 529191] Re: X freeze - Screen turns black entirely

2010-03-13 Thread useResa
Since there has been several updates since I reported this I like to update the status. At the moment I am using the following version of the package (partial output of aptitude show xserver-xorg-video intel: Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel State: installed Automatically installed: no Version:

[Bug 529191] Re: X freeze - Screen turns black entirely

2010-03-13 Thread useResa
Tried to perform the apport-collect, unfortunately I am also affected by bug #538097 so could not sent the report. If you need new and/or additional information, please advise -- X freeze - Screen turns black entirely https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529191 You received this bug notification

[Bug 529191] Re: X freeze - Screen turns black entirely

2010-03-06 Thread useResa
I like to add some screenshots to support why I have the idea this is intel related. After login I get a crash detected message most of the time, see attachment. ** Attachment added: Screenshot-ApplicationProblem.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40323920/Screenshot-ApplicationProblem.png --

[Bug 529191] Re: X freeze - Screen turns black entirely

2010-03-05 Thread useResa
** Tags added: apport-collected -- X freeze - Screen turns black entirely https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 529191] Re: X freeze - Screen turns black entirely

2010-03-05 Thread useResa
Bryce, no worries. My conclusion based on the added tags by myself is that the information has been collected and passed on. If you require more information, please let me know. -- X freeze - Screen turns black entirely https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529191 You received this bug notification

[Bug 529191] Re: X freeze - Screen turns black entirely

2010-03-04 Thread useResa
I have tried to run (I suppose from a terminal) 'ubuntu-bug 529191' but then a window pops up indicating: The specified process ID does not belong to a program. Could you please instruct on how to run? TIA -- X freeze - Screen turns black entirely https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529191 You

[Bug 529191] Re: X freeze - Screen turns black entirely

2010-03-04 Thread useResa
What does work is running 'ubuntu-bug xserver-xorg-video-intel' and this does create a report. However, I do not know how to attach this information to this existing bug report. Please advise on next steps. TIA -- X freeze - Screen turns black entirely https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529191

[Bug 529191] [NEW] Screen turns black entirely

2010-02-27 Thread useResa
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel Release: 10.04, Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel Version: 2:2.9.1-1ubuntu6 Have installed lucid today on a separate partition (ext4) on a Dell Dimension that runs karmic as a main distro. What

[Bug 529191] Re: Screen turns black entirely

2010-02-27 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39863882/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: IntelGpuDump.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39863883/IntelGpuDump.txt ** Attachment added: ProcAttrCurrent.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39863884/ProcAttrCurrent.gz

[Bug 436148] Re: cupsd: Child exited on signal 15! (Invalid cupsd.conf configuration)

2009-10-11 Thread useResa
Dereck Wonnacott's comment got me thinking (and worried that I may have reported something wrong). As a result of his comment I checked again and the reported content was indeed the content of /etc/cups/cupsd.conf (see attachment). What I did was: rdrij...@dell-thuis:/etc/cups$ sudo cp

[Bug 259385] Re: [i845] Intrepid Compiz freezes on login for i845

2009-09-26 Thread useResa
This morning's (at least for me morning) updates resulted in new versions of compiz and xserver-xorg-video-intel packages. compiz: Version: 1:0.8.3+git20090917-0ubuntu4 xserver-xorg-video-intel: Version: 2:2.8.1-1ubuntu2 I can confirm that indeed the intel 845G driver has been blacklisted again:

[Bug 259385] Re: [i845] Intrepid Compiz freezes on login for i845

2009-09-24 Thread useResa
I am running Karmic, fully updated, on a Dell Dimension 2300 with the indicated Intel card see below result of lspci -vvnn command: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Device [8086:2562] (rev 01) I have the following

[Bug 436148] [NEW] cupsd: Child exited on signal 15!

2009-09-24 Thread useResa
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cups I am running an updated version of Karmic on a Dell Dimension 2300. Result of lsb_release -rd: Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch) Release:9.10 Version of cups package that is installed: cups: Installed: 1.4.1-2

[Bug 420900] Re: grub2 error detecting Fedorainitrd

2009-09-10 Thread useResa
The same issue happens to me with the detection of CentOS. The grub.cfg reads: menuentry CentOS release 5.3 (Final) (on /dev/sda6) { insmod ext2 set root=(hd0,6) search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 4870fcd7-5b5b-4276-97ee-a8134dd68e2a linux

[Bug 385398] Re: Please unblacklist intel chips in compiz for testing

2009-09-10 Thread useResa
I am running Karmic and have the following release of compiz installed (partial listing of aptitude show compiz): Package: compiz State: installed Automatically installed: no Version: 1:0.8.2-0ubuntu16 Priority: optional Section: x11 I do have one of the blacklisted intel chips, ID 8086:2562

[Bug 420900] Re: grub2 error detecting Fedorainitrd

2009-09-10 Thread useResa
Thanks for the feedback on the hda/sda item. Understandable. And not a too big issue once you know how to fix it ;-) Before Karmic I used to install CentOS with GRUB (1.5 IIRC) and use the chainloader. However ... since Karmic I have install the additional distributions that I have (currently

[Bug 426166] [NEW] grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg

2009-09-08 Thread useResa
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub I am running Karmic Koala with the 2.6.31-9-generic kernel on a Dell Dimension 2300. After today's update (which also included an update of grub-pc) the update-grub command detects the other distributions installed on my desktop but does not

[Bug 426166] Re: grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg

2009-09-08 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: uname-a.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31478138/uname-a.log -- grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426166 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 426166] Re: grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg

2009-09-08 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: version.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31478173/version.log -- grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426166 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 426166] Re: grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg

2009-09-08 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: dmesg.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31478177/dmesg.log -- grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426166 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 426166] Re: grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg

2009-09-08 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: lspci-vnvn.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31478181/lspci-vnvn.log -- grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426166 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 426166] Re: grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg

2009-09-08 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: update-grub.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31478185/update-grub.log -- grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426166 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 426166] Re: grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg

2009-09-08 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: grub.cfg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31478238/grub.cfg -- grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426166 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 426166] Re: grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg

2009-09-08 Thread useResa
** Attachment added: grub-pc.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31478244/grub-pc.log -- grub2 detects other distributions but does not include them in grub.cfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426166 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 379308] Re: Firefox 3.5: Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9.1b5pre and 1.9.1b5pre

2009-05-25 Thread useResa
After the update I performed today (packages may have been released earlier but I only had the possibility to update today) Firefox 3.5 is working again. The current versions I have now are: Firefox 3.5: 3.5~hg20090523r25715+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~intrepid Xulrunner 1.9.1:

[Bug 379308] [NEW] Firefox 3.5: Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9.1b5pre and 1.9.1b5pre

2009-05-22 Thread useResa
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.5 I am using the daily built of Firefox 3.5 in Intrepid and for this I am using the following repositories: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa/ubuntu intrepid main deb-src

[Bug 260374] Re: firefox 3 crashes with segmentation fault

2009-01-22 Thread useResa
Thanks for informing me of the closure of this bug. I can indicate that I have not have had any of these issues anymore (currently on FF 3.0.5). -- firefox 3 crashes with segmentation fault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260374 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 255846] Re: aticonfig crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()

2008-10-16 Thread useResa
Just one more comment. I have tried to run ubuntu-bug fglrx-installer and I got the following message back from Apport Package fglrx- installer does not exist. -- aticonfig crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255846 You received this bug notification

[Bug 255846] Re: aticonfig crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()

2008-10-16 Thread useResa
Furthermore -- as requested -- also the Xorg.0.log file ** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18604021/Xorg.0.log -- aticonfig crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255846 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 255846] Re: aticonfig crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()

2008-10-16 Thread useResa
I have tried the latest version and I still get a segmentation fault (sorry). Please find attached the result of my installation and the running of aticonfig. ** Attachment added: Result of installation and aticonfig http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18603994/xorg-driver-fglrx_installation.txt --

[Bug 176619] Re: Hardy Alpha 1: Package python-pyatspi (not) autoremovable

2008-09-20 Thread useResa
I no longer have this issue. Sorry for not coming back on this. As far as I am concerned this bug can be closed -- Hardy Alpha 1: Package python-pyatspi (not) autoremovable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 186167] Re: dmesg: Driver 'sd' needs updating - please use bus_type methods

2008-09-13 Thread useResa
I have Xubuntu Intrepid installed with the new kernel (result of uname -r below): 2.6.27-3-generic I still encounter the same messages as reported by the OP. As also the indicated sr message. From dmesg (using the command: dmesg | grep -i sd) [9.746996] Driver 'sd' needs updating - please

  1   2   >