This issue was reported against karmic, so can you confirm if this issue
exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04 Alpha release? ISO CD
images are available at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/ .
Thanks in advance.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
This issue was reported against karmic, so can you confirm if this issue
exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04 Alpha release? ISO CD
images are available at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/ .
Thanks in advance.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
This issue was reported against karmic, so can you confirm if this issue
exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04 Alpha release? ISO CD
images are available at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/ .
Thanks in advance.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
Seems like these statements:
Not using default mode some_resolution (exceeds panel dimensions)
Not using default mode some_resolution (monitor doesn't support reduced
blanking)
are causing the issue and thanks for checking this against the latest
kernel, that saves me the trouble of asking you
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. I am currently unable to reproduce this bug with the
instructions you gave in the description (I have the same graphics
card),there have been many changes in Ubuntu since that time you
reported the bug and your
Will work on this one :) Thanks.
** Changed in: squeak-vm (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Vikram Dhillon (dhillon-v10)
--
version 3.10-5 is available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390037
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Seems like we might have to wait for some time:
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=mdadm but when it
does go over to Testing I will merge it over :) Thanks.
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Vikram Dhillon (dhillon-v10)
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu
2.1 in Sid: http://packages.debian.org/sid/audacious. Will look into
packaging 2.2. Thanks.
** Changed in: audacious (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Vikram Dhillon (dhillon-v10)
** Changed in: audacious (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Please package audacious 2.2 for lucid
Is this better?
** Patch added: merge 2
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39392956/debian_2.diff
--
Please merge system-config-lvm (1.1.11-2) from Debian Testing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523580
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Fixed the changelog
** Changed in: system-config-lvm (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
Please merge system-config-lvm (1.1.11-2) from Debian Testing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523580
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
/196699
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug.
--
Warm regards
Vikram Singh
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
you win.” - M K Gandhi
--
dist-upgrade crashes while upgrading from 7.04 to 7.10
https
Yes I think it would be nice to close this ticket as obsolete (should I do
it since I have raised this issue ?).
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Rolf Leggewie launchpad.net@
rolf.leggewie.biz wrote:
Vikram, thank you for the quick response. I'm not 100% sure what you
mean by deferred
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: system-config-lvm
Changelogs:
Latest Ubuntu Changelog:
system-config-lvm (1.1.11-1ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low
* Merge from Debian unstable. Remaining changes:
- In Ubuntu, we use udev rather than an init script to activate lvm2, so
don't
Applies cleanly on -p0:
$ patch -p0 debian.diff
patching file debian/changelog
patching file debian/control
patching file debian/system-config-lvm.sh
$
** Patch added: merge
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39338157/debian.diff
--
Please merge system-config-lvm (1.1.11-2) from Debian
** Patch removed: merge
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39338157/debian.diff
** Patch added: merge
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39338854/debian.diff
--
Please merge system-config-lvm (1.1.11-2) from Debian Testing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523580
You received this bug notification
Applies fine with -p0
$ patch -p0 debian.diff
patching file debian/changelog
patching file debian/control
patching file debian/rules
patching file debian/upstart
$
** Patch added: merge
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39342054/debian.diff
--
Please merge hostname (3.03) from Debian
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: hostname
Changelogs:
Latest Ubuntu Changelog:
hostname (3.01ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low
* Resynchronise with Debian. Remaining changes:
- Install Upstart job to set hostname on startup, but do not run it in
postinst.
- Build-depend on
Sorry for the inconvenience Daniel, and thanks for waiting, I fixed the
patch :)
vik...@ubuntu-devel:~/Documents/MOTU/syncs/acpid_merge/build/acpid-2.0.1$ patch
-p0 debian_acpid.debdiff
patching file debian/acpid.install
patching file debian/acpid.preinst
patching file debian/acpid.upstart
@Matthew Paul Thomas: Alright, I can modify what I wrote and achieve
what is needed :) its a pretty basic script so do you want me to change
it and then you can push it to the website
--
help.ubuntu.com does not tell you how to determine which version you have
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Vikram Dhillon (dhillon-v10) = (unassigned)
--
No help or documentation available for Ubuntu installer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114521
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Thanks for the patch Benjamin, is there anything else I could do to
assist here.
--
Please sync libxml-security-java (1.4.3-2) from Debian Testing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511448
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ltspfs
Change-logs:
Latest Debian Changelog:
ltspfs (0.5.14-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version:
- Fix mount point access when the users are in the same primary group.
- Fix localapp mount when remote and local user doesn't
** Patch added: merge
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38690035/ubuntu_ltspfs.debdiff
--
Please merge ltspfs (0.5.14-1) from Debian Testing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516403
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: libcommons-attributes-java
Changelogs:
Latest Debian Changelog:
libcommons-attributes-java (2.2-7) unstable; urgency=low
* New libcommons-attributes-java-doc package:
- Install API Javadoc to /usr/share/doc/libcommons-attributes-java/api/
*
Applies cleanly on -p0
** Patch added: merge
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38590273/libcommons-attribute-java.debdiff
--
Please merge libcommons-attributes-java (2.2-7) from Debian Testing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515259
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Patch removed: merge
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38590273/libcommons-attribute-java.debdiff
** Patch added: merge
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38591837/libcommons-attribute-java.debdiff
--
Please merge libcommons-attributes-java (2.2-7) from Debian Testing
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mii-diag
Changelogs:
Latest Debian Changelog:
mii-diag (2.11-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Adopt package (Closes: #541000)
* Add ${misc:Depends} to depends
* Make lintian happy wrt make clean (Yes, the Makefile is shipped by us and
therefore
A friendly ping on this one, AFAIK from the last meeting, I believe I am
not the only one working on these docs. so can anyone give me an update
of how much work is done, and what's left
--
No help or documentation available for Ubuntu installer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114521
You
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ssl-cert
Changelogs:
Latest Debian Changelogs:
ssl-cert (1.0.25) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix purging in case the snakeoil ssl key has been removed manually.
Closes: #555042
* Remove directories and hash symlink on purge.
* Use
Applies cleanly on -p0
** Patch added: patch
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38474657/ssl3.debdiff
--
Please merge ssl-cert (1.0.25) from Debian Testing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513574
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Thanks for reporting this bug to make Ubuntu better. As of now (Karmic)
GRUB doesn't make the menu.lst file anymore so we can safely close this
one.
** Changed in: grub (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
Grub writes a faulty menu.lst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215972
You received
My apologies for the noise here, please ignore my comment.
** Changed in: grub (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = New
--
Grub writes a faulty menu.lst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215972
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04 release -
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the issue remains
in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel build -
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04 release -
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the issue remains
in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel build -
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04 release -
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the issue remains
in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel build -
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04 release -
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the issue remains
in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel build -
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04 release -
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the issue remains
in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel build -
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04 release -
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the issue remains
in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel build -
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04 release -
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the issue remains
in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel build -
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04 release -
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the issue remains
in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel build -
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Can you confirm this issue exists with the most recent Lucid Lynx 10.04
release - http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/. If the
issue remains in Lucid, please test the latest 2.6.32 upstream kernel
build - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds. Let us know your
results.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: libxml-security-java
Changelogs:
Latest Debian Changelog:
libxml-security-java (1.4.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Thierry Carrez ]
* debian/build.xml: Build Java2 code to match runtime dependency
* debian/build.xml: Fix the jar packaging to
** Attachment added: the changes
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38290935/patch.debdiff
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: libxml-security-java
Changelogs:
Latest Debian Changelog:
libxml-security-java (1.4.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
-[ Thierry Carrez ]
-*
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: libxml-security-java
Changelogs:
Latest Debian Changelog:
libxml-security-java (1.4.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Thierry Carrez ]
* debian/build.xml: Build Java2 code to match runtime dependency
* debian/build.xml: Fix the jar packaging to
** Attachment added: the changes
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38290935/patch.debdiff
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: libxml-security-java
Changelogs:
Latest Debian Changelog:
libxml-security-java (1.4.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
-[ Thierry Carrez ]
-*
Public bug reported:
Changelogs:
Latest Debian Changelog:
cln (1.3.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/copyright: Clarify license (GPL v2).
* debian/compat: debhelper compatibility version 6.
-- Richard Kreckel krec...@ginac.de Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:39:47 +0100
Latest Ubuntu Changelog:
** Attachment added: cln merge
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38014945/cln.debdiff
--
Please merge cln (1.3.1-2) from Debian Testing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508995
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Alright I fixed my changelog and I am attaching the fixed diff. Daniel
could you try patching with -p0 geser tested it and said it works fine
on -p0. Thanks.
** Attachment added: second diff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37985587/acpid.debdiff
--
Please merge acpid (1:2.0.0-1) from Debian
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: acpid
Changelogs:
Latest Debian Changelog:
acpid (1:2.0.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Put kacpimon back into the right section and priority.
* Make loading of all modules work with modules.dep files with
relative paths. (Closes: #563915)
** Attachment added: merge diff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37910832/acpid.debdiff
--
Please merge acpid (1:2.0.0-1) from Debian testing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507778
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Please see if this one is correct. Thanks
** Attachment added: mew merge
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37836524/mew.debdiff
--
Please merge mew (1:6.3-1) from Debian Testing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
This could be a regression caused by the kernel so can you try to boot
into an older kernel (if you have one present on your system) and see if
that solves your problem. Thanks.
** Also affects: linux
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
session active, not inhibited, screen idle
The upstream seems pretty active, so I'll update this one. Thanks.
** Changed in: unetbootin (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Vikram Dhillon (dhillon-v10)
--
Please update UNetbootin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464560
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Uploaded the updated version in a ppa [1] here. It should build soon and
then it can be included in lucid.
[1] https://edge.launchpad.net/~dhillon-v10/+archive/update-unetbootin
** Changed in: unetbootin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Please update UNetbootin
It seems like we get UNetbootin from Debian so, we need to sync it from
Debian.
** Changed in: unetbootin (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Vikram Dhillon (dhillon-v10) = (unassigned)
--
Please update UNetbootin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464560
You received this bug notification because you
There is not a single screenshot anywhere.
I know marketing is not Kubuntus strong side, but this is ridiculous.
Sorry I forgot to make that change,its done now. Until the new website
is fully complete, we will have to do with this one :) so I went ahead
and made this change.
--
Regards,
Vikram Dhillon
This bug doesn't apply to the Ubuntu website, and it seems like the
mirror is okay now so closing it. Thanks
** Changed in: ubuntu-website
Status: New = Invalid
--
au.archive.ubuntu.com is useless.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162865
You received this bug notification because you are
Check here: http://www.kubuntu.org/tour near the bottom of the page it
links to coding studio website. The links do need to be updated for
Ubuntu 9.10 and then later on to Lucid which I will talke to the
webmaster of Kubuntu. Until then I am closing this one, there is a
screenshot tour. Also the
* talk
--
Kubuntu website doesn't have a single screenshot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kubuntu-meta in ubuntu.
--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
I updated the link and now it points to Kubuntu 9.10, I will be changing
this as time goes on and newer version come out
** Changed in: kubuntu-website
Status: Invalid = Fix Released
--
Kubuntu website doesn't have a single screenshot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481294
You received
the
cd in and then browse to the cd, after that click on the update script
and that should do the job.
--
Regards,
Vikram Dhillon
~~~
There are lots of Linux users who don't care how the kernel works, but
only want to use it. That is a tribute to how good Linux is.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
Update
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mew
Changelogs:
Latest Debian Changelog:
mew (1:6.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
- UTF-8 hack for Emacs 23. (closes: #542049)
* debian/*: Merged from mew-beta.
-- Tatsuya Kinoshita t...@debian.org Sat, 21 Nov 2009
Here's the patch
** Attachment added: merge
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37434789/mew.debdiff
--
Please merge mew (1:6.3-1) from Debian Testing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: New = Confirmed
--
incomplete right-click menu in open file window
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501139
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Alright are we talking about the alternate disk, that's the only way you
can upgrade to a new release.
--
Update from CD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496130
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
201 - 300 of 422 matches
Mail list logo
