The Precise Pangolin has reached end of life, so this bug will not be
fixed for that release
** Changed in: mod-proxy-html (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Oops, I meant duplicate of bug 988819.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005425
Title:
[SRU] Not looking for library in multiarch-friendly path
To manage notifications about this bug g
Is this a duplicate of bug 1005425? The bugs seem almost exactly the
same, and that one already has some fixes released. I, personally, can't
tell the difference at all.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
Please see bug 988819 - this includes an apache2 change to make apache
use dlopen as a fallback so that the .so file can be specificied without
a full path.
Its currently in -proposed awaiting verification.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
** Changed in: mod-proxy-html (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
** Changed in: mod-proxy-html (Ubuntu)
Assignee: kroq-gar78 (kroq-gar78) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
Hi,
Performed the test in quantal-server-amd64.iso and this is no issue in
Quantal. The LoadFile directive looks nice without any absolute path,
probably using some LD_LIBPATH or LIBRARY_PATH in the background.
root@b64s1210:/etc/apache2/mods-enabled# dpkg -l | grep proxy-ht
ii libapache2-mod-pr
** Changed in: mod-proxy-html (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005425
Title:
[SRU] Not looking for library in multiarch-friendly path
T
Can anyone confirm if this is still an issue in Quantal? Version
3.0.1-1.1 which was synced from Debian should have fixed this.
mod-proxy-html (3.0.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Modify the path of libxml2.so.2 in conf file, update the minmal
version of apac
Hi,
ran the sed command and apache starts with the module enabled (both 64 and 32
bit installations).
This issue seems to be resolved.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005425
Title:
Ok, added the impact. As soon as you test the fix, I'll set my branch to
merge and they'll hopefully have it uploaded in a little while. Can you
please test the command I wrote eariler? Thanks.
** Description changed:
SRU Request for Precise
# SRU Justification #
[Impact]
+ Si
IMPACT:
LOW-MEDIUM
Site-forwarding is not possible,
- 12.04 cannot be used as a forwarding host to link to sites hosted within a
private network.
(just keep using previous ubuntu version for the moment)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Also, can you test this fix by running
sed -i "s/\/usr\/lib\/libxml2.so.2/\/usr\/lib\/`uname -i`-linux-
gnu\/libxml2.so.2/g" /etc/apache2/mods-available/proxy_html.load
in a terminal and seeing if it solves the problem? Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
Gerben,
Can you fill out the Impact field? Basically, what is the impact of the
problem? Thanks! Once you do that, I'll request a merge.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005425
Title:
Good patch (that works)
** Patch added: "Fix path to use multiarch-friendly in 'postinst' script"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mod-proxy-html/+bug/1005425/+attachment/3169684/+files/mod-proxy-html_1005425.patch
** Patch removed: "Fix path to use multiarch-friendly in 'postinst' s
Maybe this should be done through debian/rules instead of
debian/postinst?
** Description changed:
SRU Request for Precise
# SRU Justification #
[Impact]
[Development Fix]
I added the sed command mentioned below into the debian/postinst script so
that the path is corre
** Tags removed: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005425
Title:
[SRU] Not looking for library in multiarch-friendly path
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bu
Thanks! I'll update my patch and branch. :)
I think I (or you, if you want) should file a separate bug report for
mod_security, unless it's already been reported.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
Hi,
The command to use is
uname -i
This produced your excepted strings on the different platforms.
I've quickly looked at other apache modules, and mod_serurity also has
the same problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
Hmm... not what I had hoped for. I'm trying to get a command to output
'i386' from your machine and 'x86_64' from mine (64-bit). Can you try
running the command "arch" on your 32-bit system? Thanks. There's got to
be a better way to do this...
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Hi,
geus@b32s1204:~$ uname -m
i686
(image ubuntu-12.04-server-i386.iso used to install inside kvm hypervisor)
Gerben
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005425
Title:
[SRU] Not looking
** Description changed:
SRU Request for Precise
# SRU Justification #
[Impact]
-
[Development Fix]
-
+ I added the sed command mentioned below into the debian/postinst script so
that the path is corrected at installation. Editing the file
(debian/conf/proxy_html.load)
The attachment "Fix path to use multiarch-friendly in 'postinst' script
(no typo)" of this bug report has been identified as being a patch. The
ubuntu-reviewers team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they
can review the patch. In the event that this is in fact not a patch you
can reso
Gerben,
Can you post the output of "uname -m" on your 32-bit machine? I'm just
trying to make sure that that's an alternative to using "dpkg-
architecture"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Hmmm... just remembered that dpkg-architecture is part of dpkg-dev, and
I don't want to add another dependency in. I'll use 'uname -m' and then
append '-linux-gnu' to that. Please tell me if anybody has an
alternative solution.
** Description changed:
+ SRU Request for Precise
+
+ # SRU Just
** Branch linked: lp:~kroq-gar78/ubuntu/quantal/mod-proxy-
html/fix-1005425
** Branch linked: lp:~kroq-gar78/ubuntu/precise/mod-proxy-
html/fix-1005425
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10
25 matches
Mail list logo