[Bug 1015798] Re: apport directs users to invisible private bugs

2012-07-16 Thread Edward Donovan
** Also affects: launchpad Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015798 Title: apport directs users to invisible private bugs To manage

[Bug 1015798] Re: apport directs users to invisible private bugs

2012-07-16 Thread Edward Donovan
I don't know (yet) where the logic, that we'd like to correct, happens: in apport's client code, or on the server side, or in a misunderstanding between them. For now, I've added Launchpad itself to this report. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1015798] Re: apport directs users to invisible private bugs

2012-07-16 Thread Curtis Hovey
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 764414 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/764414 ** Changed in: launchpad Status: New = Invalid ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 764414 private master bugs are confusing and lead to more duplicate filings -- You received this bug

[Bug 1015798] Re: apport directs users to invisible private bugs

2012-07-16 Thread Laura Czajkowski
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 764414 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/764414 Once bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/943497 is fixed this will make things a lot easier for people. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1015798] Re: apport directs users to invisible private bugs

2012-06-24 Thread Edward Donovan
** Summary changed: - apport shows non existing bug + apport directs users to invisible private bugs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015798 Title: apport directs users to invisible

[Bug 1015798] Re: apport directs users to invisible private bugs

2012-06-24 Thread Edward Donovan
Well, I searched around a bit, and I couldn't find something that seemed to address this. Such a discussion could happen in a number of different places (or I may just be slow), so I could be missing it. This might be relevant: Martin's blog entry, announcing client-side duplicate checking,