[Bug 1020166] Re: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799

2012-09-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for socat (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to socat in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1020166] Re: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799

2012-09-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for socat (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020166

[Bug 1020166] Re: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799

2012-07-09 Thread Todd Taft
Shouldn't the update come from the socat package maintainer (Chris Taylor)? ** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to socat in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1020166] Re: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799

2012-07-09 Thread Marc Deslauriers
No. There is no concept of package maintainers in Ubuntu. Anyone is welcome to attach a debdiff that fixes the issue, and subscribing ubuntu-security-sponsors, at which point someone from the security team will review it and upload it. ** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu) Status: New =

[Bug 1020166] Re: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799

2012-07-09 Thread Todd Taft
Shouldn't the update come from the socat package maintainer (Chris Taylor)? ** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020166 Title:

[Bug 1020166] Re: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799

2012-07-09 Thread Marc Deslauriers
No. There is no concept of package maintainers in Ubuntu. Anyone is welcome to attach a debdiff that fixes the issue, and subscribing ubuntu-security-sponsors, at which point someone from the security team will review it and upload it. ** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu) Status: New =

[Bug 1020166] Re: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799

2012-07-06 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest coordinating with upstream and posting a debdiff for this issue. When a debdiff is

[Bug 1020166] Re: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799

2012-07-06 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest coordinating with upstream and posting a debdiff for this issue. When a debdiff is

[Bug 1020166] Re: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799

2012-07-03 Thread Robie Basak
The sync in bug 613761 fixed this in Maverick and beyond, so there's only Lucid and Hardy to consider. Note that socat is in universe. ** This bug has been flagged as a security vulnerability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1020166] Re: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799

2012-07-03 Thread Robie Basak
The sync in bug 613761 fixed this in Maverick and beyond, so there's only Lucid and Hardy to consider. Note that socat is in universe. ** This bug has been flagged as a security vulnerability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to