** Changed in: netcdf (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041742
Title:
netcdf build against parallel HDF5
To manage notifications about this
** Changed in: netcdf (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041742
Title:
netcdf build against parallel HDF5
To manage notifications about this bug
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #708638
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708638
** Changed in: netcdf (Debian)
Importance: Undecided => Unknown
** Changed in: netcdf (Debian)
Status: New => Unknown
** Changed in: netcdf (Debian)
Remote watch: None => Debian
Hi, can you please forward the patches on a new Debian bug? This should
be fixed in Debian before, I think.
I'll be happy to sponsor/sync the package after.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I'd like to support the idea of having a libnetcdf-openmpi-dev package,
too. Having it would be a grate relief.
Well, I tried to build it my own, however, with no success.
Maybe someone could help me out with this?
The following is what I did:
1. Sources and build dependencies
apt-get source
I did some work for this in https://launchpad.net/~nschloe/+archive
/trilinos-nightly which you may want to check out. It's based off of
netCDF's latest dev version which provides a CMake builds, doing away
with many of the flaws previously present.
--
You received this bug notification because
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: netcdf (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041742
Title:
I support the idea of a package libnetcdf-openmpi-dev. The current state
is quite unsatisfying. It took me ages to find out that the library is
built with hdf5 support, but not with hdf5-parallel. Surprisingly, the
netcdf routines themself did not give any warning, when trying to use
parallel I/O
