This bug was fixed in the package ibus-table - 1.4.99.20121012-1
---
ibus-table (1.4.99.20121012-1) experimental; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
-- Asias He as...@debian.org Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:23:23 +0800
ibus-table (1.4.99.20121003-1) experimental; urgency=low
* New
You mean raring get synchronized?
That's fine, since I'd like to re-version ibus-table somehow and maintain a
separate 1.4.x branch for Ubuntu current stable release's concern.
** Tags removed: precise quantal
** Tags added: raring
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Thank you for your bug report, does it require ibus 1.4.99 as well?
** Changed in: ibus-table (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063948
No. No big (architectural) change is made.
AFAIK, at least following bug are fixed:
http://code.google.com/p/ibus/issues/detail?id=704
http://code.google.com/p/ibus/issues/detail?id=1026
http://code.google.com/p/ibus/issues/detail?id=1188
http://code.google.com/p/ibus/issues/detail?id=1328
** Summary changed:
- Upgrade to ibus-table-1.4.99.20121003
+ Upgrade to ibus-table-1.4.99.20121003 or ibus-table-1.4.99.20121012
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063948
Title:
