[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2021-10-13 Thread Steve Langasek
The Precise Pangolin has reached end of life, so this bug will not be fixed for that release ** Changed in: linux-meta-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2014-12-03 Thread Rolf Leggewie
quantal has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any updates. Marking the quantal task for this ticket as Won't Fix. ** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: Fix Committed = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2013-05-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta-armadaxp - 3.2.0.1617.23 --- linux-meta-armadaxp (3.2.0.1617.23) precise-proposed; urgency=low * Depend on linux-armadaxp 3.2.0-1616.24 * Move metapackages to Section: kernel - LP: #1074787 * Correct vcs-git link -- Ike Panhc

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2013-04-10 Thread Jani Monoses
** Changed in: linux-meta-armadaxp (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: Jani Monoses (jani) = Ike Panhc (ikepanhc) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074787 Title: linux-meta metapackages

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2013-04-10 Thread Ike Panhc
** Changed in: linux-meta-armadaxp (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074787 Title: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2013-01-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta-lowlatency - 3.2.0.36.26 --- linux-meta-lowlatency (3.2.0.36.26) precise; urgency=low * Change sections to devel/kernel to match the archive (LP: #1074787) -- Adam Conrad adcon...@ubuntu.com Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:09:04 -0700 ** Changed

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2013-01-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta-lowlatency - 3.5.0.22.21 --- linux-meta-lowlatency (3.5.0.22.21) quantal; urgency=low * Change sections to devel/kernel to match the archive (LP: #1074787) * Update linux-flavor to depend on linux-headers-flavor (LP: #960770) -- Adam

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2013-01-17 Thread Adam Conrad
** Changed in: linux-meta-lowlatency (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: linux-meta-lowlatency (Ubuntu Quantal) Assignee: (unassigned) = Adam Conrad (adconrad) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2013-01-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta-ac100 - 3.0.27.1.2 --- linux-meta-ac100 (3.0.27.1.2) precise; urgency=low * Change sections to devel/kernel to match the archive (LP: #1074787) * Update linux-ac100 to depend on linux-headers-ac100 (LP: #960770) -- Adam Conrad

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2013-01-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta-ac100 - 3.1.10.6.2 --- linux-meta-ac100 (3.1.10.6.2) quantal; urgency=low * Change sections to devel/kernel to match the archive (LP: #1074787) * Update linux-ac100 to depend on linux-headers-ac100 (LP: #960770) -- Adam Conrad

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2013-01-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/linux-meta-lowlatency ** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/quantal-proposed/linux-meta-lowlatency -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074787 Title:

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2013-01-17 Thread Adam Conrad
** Changed in: linux-meta-lowlatency (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-meta-lowlatency (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: (unassigned) = Adam Conrad (adconrad) ** Changed in: linux-meta-lowlatency (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed --

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2013-01-15 Thread Colin Watson
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected, Accepted linux-meta-ac100 into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta- ac100/3.0.27.1.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2013-01-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/precise/linux-meta-ac100 /precise-proposed ** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/quantal/linux-meta-ac100 /quantal-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2013-01-14 Thread Adam Conrad
** Changed in: linux-meta-ac100 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: linux-meta-ac100 (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: (unassigned) = Adam Conrad (adconrad) ** Changed in: linux-meta-ac100 (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in:

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-12-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta-ti-omap4 - 3.5.0.216.17 --- linux-meta-ti-omap4 (3.5.0.216.17) quantal; urgency=low * Change sections to devel/kernel to match the archive (LP: #1074787) * Make linux-omap4 depend on linux-headers-omap4, the same as master. -- Adam

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-12-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta-armadaxp - 3.5.0.1606.9 --- linux-meta-armadaxp (3.5.0.1606.9) quantal; urgency=low * Change sections to devel/kernel to match the archive (LP: #1074787) * Make linux-armadaxp depend on linux-headers-armadaxp, same as master. -- Adam

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-12-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta-armadaxp - 3.5.0.1606.9 --- linux-meta-armadaxp (3.5.0.1606.9) quantal; urgency=low * Change sections to devel/kernel to match the archive (LP: #1074787) * Make linux-armadaxp depend on linux-headers-armadaxp, same as master. -- Adam

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-12-21 Thread Adam Conrad
** Changed in: linux-meta-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Quantal) Assignee: Paolo Pisati (p-pisati) = Adam Conrad (adconrad) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074787 Title: linux-meta

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-12-20 Thread Adam Conrad
** Changed in: linux-meta-nexus7 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-meta-nexus7 (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-12-20 Thread Adam Conrad
** Changed in: linux-meta-ac100 (Ubuntu Raring) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: linux-meta-ac100 (Ubuntu Raring) Assignee: (unassigned) = Adam Conrad (adconrad) ** Changed in: linux-meta-nexus7 (Ubuntu Raring) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in:

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-12-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta-ac100 - 3.1.10.6.1 --- linux-meta-ac100 (3.1.10.6.1) raring; urgency=low * Change sections to devel/kernel to match the archive (LP: #1074787) * Make linux-nexus7 depend on linux-headers-nexus7, like with master. -- Adam Conrad

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-12-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta-nexus7 - 3.1.10.8.15 --- linux-meta-nexus7 (3.1.10.8.15) raring; urgency=low * Change sections to devel/kernel to match the archive (LP: #1074787) * Make linux-nexus7 depend on linux-headers-nexus7, like with master. -- Adam Conrad

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-12-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta-ti-omap4 - 3.5.0.216.16 --- linux-meta-ti-omap4 (3.5.0.216.16) raring; urgency=low * Change sections to devel/kernel to match the archive (LP: #1074787) * Make linux-nexus7 depend on linux-headers-nexus7, like with master. -- Adam

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-12-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/linux-meta-ac100 ** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/linux-meta-ti-omap4 ** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/linux-meta-nexus7 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074787

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-12-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta - 3.2.0.35.40 --- linux-meta (3.2.0.35.40) precise-proposed; urgency=low [ Brad Figg ] * UBUNTU: The -hv- driver should be for the same flavour of kernel generic-generic, virtual-virtual, generic-pae-generic-pae - LP: #1089970

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-12-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/linux-meta -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074787 Title: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages' To manage

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-11-28 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Changed in: linux-meta-lowlatency (Ubuntu Raring) Status: New = Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-meta-lowlatency (Ubuntu Raring) Assignee: (unassigned) = Andy Whitcroft (apw) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-11-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/raring-proposed/linux-meta-lowlatency -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074787 Title: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages' To

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-11-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta-lowlatency - 3.7.0.4.5 --- linux-meta-lowlatency (3.7.0.4.5) raring; urgency=low * Bump ABI for 3.7.0-4 kernels. * Move metapackages to Section: kernel. (LP: #1074787) * Drop the Vcs-Git: link as we are not using source control. --

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-11-27 Thread Adam Conrad
** Also affects: linux-meta-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-meta-armadaxp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-meta-lowlatency (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects:

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-11-27 Thread Adam Conrad
** Also affects: linux-meta-ppc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux-meta-ppc (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-meta-ppc (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-meta-ppc (Ubuntu Raring)

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-11-27 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/raring/linux-meta-ppc /raring-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074787 Title: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-11-21 Thread Tim Gardner
** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: (unassigned) = Leann Ogasawara (leannogasawara) ** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-meta

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-11-20 Thread Leann Ogasawara
** Description changed: - Packages built from linux-meta source are currently in Section: - metapackages. The original rationale for this was that Recommends were - handled differently for 'metapackages' (bug #114662). + == SRU Justification == + Packages built from linux-meta source are

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-11-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/raring-proposed/linux-meta -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074787 Title: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages' To manage

[Bug 1074787] Re: linux-meta metapackages should not be in section 'metapackages'

2012-11-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta - 3.7.0.3.7 --- linux-meta (3.7.0.3.7) raring; urgency=low * linux ABI 3.7.0-3 * Move metapackages to Section: kernel -LP: #1074787 * Update RELEASE_NAME and Vcs-Git to Raring -- Leann Ogasawara leann.ogasaw...@canonical.com