[Bug 1084146] Re: [SRU] raphael new upstream release (2.1.0)

2013-01-25 Thread Steve Langasek
As Clint says, this doesn't fit the SRU policy. If the raphael source is already bundled in the maas source package in precise, we should keep it this way; I don't see any reason that it's worth splitting this out, clobbering the existing raphael package in precise, in an SRU when keeping it in

[Bug 1084146] Re: [SRU] raphael new upstream release (2.1.0)

2013-01-25 Thread Steve Langasek
As Clint says, this doesn't fit the SRU policy. If the raphael source is already bundled in the maas source package in precise, we should keep it this way; I don't see any reason that it's worth splitting this out, clobbering the existing raphael package in precise, in an SRU when keeping it in

[Bug 1084146] Re: [SRU] raphael new upstream release (2.1.0)

2012-12-28 Thread Clint Byrum
Hello! This upload is not appropriate as per the normal SRU policy. If we're going to ship a new upstream release in an SRU without any bug fixes enumerated, it will need an exception from the Tech Board. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which

[Bug 1084146] Re: [SRU] raphael new upstream release (2.1.0)

2012-12-28 Thread Clint Byrum
Hello! This upload is not appropriate as per the normal SRU policy. If we're going to ship a new upstream release in an SRU without any bug fixes enumerated, it will need an exception from the Tech Board. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is