[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2024-04-30 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783 Title: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format To

[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2020-01-08 Thread Sebastien Bacher
@Robert, I would start by getting the security team's input on using mozjs or duktape, if it's a no go from their side then we know what are our options. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2020-01-07 Thread Robert Ancell
I've made a forum post asking for feedback from users of polkit in Ubuntu (https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/use-of-javascript-rules-in- polkit/13892). If you have comments please add them there instead of this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2020-01-07 Thread Robert Ancell
An update on the current state of this: - polkit upstream currently depends on mozjs60 - mozjs60 is in main, but only for the use of GNOME Shell. - The current polkit Debian/Ubuntu package has 61 patches in it, backporting lots of changes from version 106 to 116. - There are upstream requests for

[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2018-08-16 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Tags added: version-blocked -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783 Title: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2016-08-29 Thread Nathan Rennie-Waldock
Could policykit be updated if it was ported to mozjs45? It would be good if we could see it updated eventually as the javascript rules are much more flexible (one use would be restricting users to specific domains with libvirt). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2016-08-01 Thread Marc Deslauriers
mozjs hasn't gotten any security updates in _years_, so no, we're not going to be able to support that package in main. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783 Title: New PolicyKit

[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2016-08-01 Thread Leonardo Borda
@mdeslaur Hi any chance we can revisit this use case again and add mazjs185 through the MIR process for newer Ubuntu versions? Thank you -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783 Title:

[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2013-12-17 Thread Robert Ancell
** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged ** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783

[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2013-08-06 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Do not merge this for now. It is unlikely we will allow an insecure library such as mozjs185 to be included in main, especially for something as security-sensitive as policykit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2013-08-02 Thread Jackson Doak
version 0.110-3 is now in debian experimental and upstream is at 0.111. Should we wait for debian to call it polkit or merge it now? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783 Title: New

[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2013-01-08 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: policykit-1 (Debian) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783 Title: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format To manage

[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2012-12-13 Thread Logan Rosen
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #689473 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689473 ** Also affects: policykit-1 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689473 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2012-12-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783 Title:

[Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2012-12-13 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: policykit-1 (Debian) Status: Unknown = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783 Title: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format To manage