[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-04-01 Thread Leann Ogasawara
d1zzyg, thanks for testing and the feedback. Since we have received no response from anyone else regarding the Hardy Heron 8.04 Alpha/Beta release I'm going to close this for now against the Hardy kernel. Please feel free to reopen (ie set the Status back to New) if you still experience issues

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-03-20 Thread d1zzyg
Fixed - for us at least. I am working in a corporate environment and the pre-boot config is out of my hands (support contracts blah blah blah). I recently got hold of an identical server and tried to install Gutsy -- it worked without a hitch! It turns out that on the first machine there was a

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-03-18 Thread d1zzyg
I'm having the same problem with a couple of DL380 G4s. The fix involving the removal of sym53c8xx drivers worked on an older G1 we have, but yields no results on the newer machines. I just keep getting back to the partition editor which says things like failed to read drive geometry and

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-02-20 Thread Leann Ogasawara
Can someone confirm this issue for the latest 8.04 Hardy Alpha release? Thanks. ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Won't Fix ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-02-14 Thread Leann Ogasawara
** Tags added: qa-hardy-kernel ** Tags removed: qa-hardy-list -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. --

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-01-26 Thread MarkC
Hi there, This may benefit others who have also had problems installing Ubuntu Server 7.10. I have just managed to install Ubuntu Server 7.10 on my Compaq DL360 G1 by followed Alex Smith's recommendation above using the module blacklist technique. - Boot from the Ubuntu Server 7.10 CD - At the

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-01-11 Thread GlennS
I had exactly the same problem on my G1 as well. After searching the web all morning and reading all your posts, I was not bothered in following all the steps outlined in the fix ISO. I am using Gutsy 7.10 server insall and had the same problem. So, what I ended up doing was, used the

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-01-11 Thread Martin Pitt
This is not even understood for Gutsy and Hardy so far, so nothing to fix for Dapper. ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.15 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Won't Fix Target: dapper-updates = None ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: linux-source-2.6.22 = linux Target:

Re: [Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-01-09 Thread dan_linder
On Jan 9, 2008 12:29 AM, tad1073 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From the Ubuntu boot screen I selected Check CD for Defects and got the errors listed below: [364.283722] ata1.01: Exception Emask 0x0 Sact 0x0 Serr 0x0 action 0x2 Frozen [364.283771] ata1.01 (BMDMA stat 0x44) [364.283822] ata1.01:

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-01-09 Thread tad1073
I forgot to mention that the CD was ordered from Ubuntu, I ordered two more which are the text based installers. I will check it on another machine. If there are no errors can you help me installing it on the machine mentioned. I am not necessarily going to use that machine as a server, for now

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-01-09 Thread tad1073
I checked the CD and there are no defects on it or with it. i kind of figured it was a compatibility issue, so now what do I do? -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110585 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-01-09 Thread tad1073
I checked the CD and there are no defects on it or with it. i kind of figured it was a compatibility issue, so now what do I do? -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110585 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-01-09 Thread CaptSaltyJack
tad: Not sure if your issue has anything to do with the cpqarray/sym53c8xx module issue. Maybe you ought to file a separate bug report? I don't mean to dismiss your problem, just trying to keep this particular bug discussion on topic. -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use

Re: [Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-01-09 Thread dan_linder
Capt. Salty: I agree. Tad: If the CD passes the check on a different system, then I would suspect the CD-ROM drive on your system. The original problem this thread was about was specifically the hard-drive controller being recognized correctly *after* installation. From what you've told us, I'd

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-01-09 Thread tad1073
i guess I will file a seperate bug report for the issue I am having. In the mean time I will try to swap the cd-rom drive out and check it again. -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110585 You received this bug notification

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-01-09 Thread tad1073
Thanks for the help. Bug filed #181678 -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2008-01-08 Thread tad1073
Spec: Compaq Proliant ML330 Pentium III 733mhz 256k cache 256mb ram Compaq Smart Array 431 Controller set to RAID0 w/25.9gb=3/9.1gb hd's System Embedded IDE Controller SCSI Controller I have been trying to get Ubuntu 7.10 on that machine for a week now. I keep getting the same errors and I am

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2007-12-28 Thread CaptSaltyJack
Not fixed in 7.10 Server. WTH?? -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2007-10-24 Thread Martin Pitt
Ben says this is not practical to do for a stable dapper update, so backing this out of Dapper.2. ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.15 (Ubuntu) Target: ubuntu-6.06.2 = dapper-updates -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2007-08-14 Thread Kyle McMartin
Could one of you paste the output of lspci -vvnn from a feisty boot? -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2007-08-14 Thread Martin Pitt
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-rc- fixes-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=b2b3c121076961333977f485f0d54c22121df920 -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110585 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2007-08-14 Thread Alex Smith
I saw that fix when I was googling around, but that fix went into .18, and it's fixed on most distros with .18 or newer, so I was mystified as to why it was happening on Gutsy. -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110585 You

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2007-08-06 Thread Alex Smith
As a workaround, you can add this to the kernel command line when booting: sym53c8xx.blacklist=true That worked for me on my Compaq Proliant DL360 (G1), after some poking around in busybox I found that d-i can have modules blacklisted by adding module.blacklist=true to the command line. --

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2007-08-06 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.15 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Triaged -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2007-08-06 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Kernel Team Status: New = Triaged Target: None = ubuntu-7.10-beta -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

[Bug 110585] Re: Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx

2007-08-03 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.15 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Compaq Proliant DL360: raid controller should use cpqarray, not sym53c8xx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for