[Bug 111255] Re: bad behaviour according to PATH variable value in a particular case

2007-09-28 Thread Niklas Klein
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 110622 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110622 command-not-found (0.2.8ubuntu1) gutsy; urgency=low [ Michael Vogt ] * added missing pyhton-apt dependency (LP: #138842) [ Niklas Klein ] * CommandNotFound/CommandNotFound.py added test for propper

[Bug 111255] Re: bad behaviour according to PATH variable value in a particular case

2007-09-17 Thread Niklas Klein
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 110622 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110622 I have added a better changelog entry (My first one didn't mention the files i have changed). ** Attachment added: command-not-found_0.2.8ubuntu1.debdiff

[Bug 111255] Re: bad behaviour according to PATH variable value in a particular case

2007-09-14 Thread Niklas Klein
I would like to help with this bug, but i need some mentoring. What i have already found out, is, that the latest source /etc/bash_command_not_found command-not-found is invoked with full path. Should i add a patch to test if (a program is in /usr/bin and /usr/bin is not in the path) and then

[Bug 111255] Re: bad behaviour according to PATH variable value in a particular case

2007-09-14 Thread Zygmunt Krynicki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 110622 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110622 Thanks for offering your help Actually this bug is a duplicate and has been fixed in 0.3 branch that never reached ubuntu (I didn't have the time to make it production- quality). I think it's possible to

[Bug 111255] Re: bad behaviour according to PATH variable value in a particular case

2007-09-14 Thread Niklas Klein
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 110622 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110622 Now i can access the code, got an lunchpad error last time i tried. -- bad behaviour according to PATH variable value in a particular case https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111255 You received this bug

[Bug 111255] Re: bad behaviour according to PATH variable value in a particular case

2007-09-14 Thread Niklas Klein
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 110622 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110622 Zygmund, i can't access the release-0.3. Can you point out me, were to get the patch you mentioned? -- bad behaviour according to PATH variable value in a particular case

[Bug 111255] Re: bad behaviour according to PATH variable value in a particular case

2007-09-14 Thread Niklas Klein
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 110622 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110622 I have merged the patch from 0.3, but i don't know how to work with those .po / .pot files? If you can give me a url of a howto or something, i will do the german translation. ** Attachment added:

[Bug 111255] Re: bad behaviour according to PATH variable value in a particular case

2007-06-24 Thread Tormod Volden
If /usr/bin is not in the PATH, command-not-found should be disabled, IMHO. Whatever packages the user will install, it will not help anyway, if the programs are not in the PATH. ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- bad behaviour according to PATH variable