[Bug 1131253] Re: [needs-packaging] Apache OpenOffice

2017-03-18 Thread JoLa
+1 for packaging Apache OpenOffice. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1131253 Title: [needs-packaging] Apache OpenOffice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1131253] Re: [needs-packaging] Apache OpenOffice

2017-03-08 Thread OOoForum
Canonical is a part of development of LibreOffice. OpenOffice is clearly a competitor. So, packaging this app in Synaptics will be a non-sense. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1131253 Ti

[Bug 1131253] Re: [needs-packaging] Apache OpenOffice

2015-08-26 Thread Alfredo3000
En 2015 Ubuntu, tiene la gran oportunidad de volverse un Lider Mundial, por que Windows 10 es insatisfactorio e inseguro debido al Cortana que no pasa de un programa espía. Millones de usuarios buscaran Ubuntu y Kubuntu. Estos nuevos usuarios huirán para Window cuando sientan la lentitud e inesta

[Bug 1131253] Re: [needs-packaging] Apache OpenOffice

2014-05-14 Thread Mozaic
@ Alex: I'am not a Debian's user, too ^^ As i know, no major linux's distribution have Apache OpenOffice in their repository. I don't know if the Apache Fondation have some projet to resolve that. Since it's not resolving, the use of Apache OpenOffice on Linux will be very poor and marginal. --

[Bug 1131253] Re: [needs-packaging] Apache OpenOffice

2014-05-14 Thread Alex
Mozaic, you are welcome to post it to Debian's bugzilla. I'm not use Debian for now. May be in future I go to Debian, but now I use Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1131253 Title:

[Bug 1131253] Re: [needs-packaging] Apache OpenOffice

2014-05-14 Thread Mozaic
I don't find similar bug on Debian, only this tread with an unofficial repository: http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=108028 I think this bug will be stronger if a similar bug is opening on Debian's bugzilla. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 1131253] Re: [needs-packaging] Apache OpenOffice

2014-05-12 Thread Alex
** Description changed: Hello. Apache OpenOffice is very good, stable and completely free office package. It is good supported by The Apache Software Foundation. Apache OpenOffice is not related to Oracle any more. For now Apache OpenOffice is trademark of The Apache Software Foundati

[Bug 1131253] Re: [needs-packaging] Apache OpenOffice

2014-05-12 Thread Björn Michaelsen
(removed unsupportable and outdated statements about LibreOffice from description. They have no place on this issue anyway.) ** Description changed: Hello. Apache OpenOffice is very good, stable and completely free office - package. This package is more stable now than the LibreOffice. And

[Bug 1131253] Re: [needs-packaging] Apache OpenOffice

2014-05-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1131253 Title: [needs-packa

[Bug 1131253] Re: [needs-packaging] Apache OpenOffice

2013-02-21 Thread Brian Murray
*** This is an automated message *** This bug is tagged needs-packaging which identifies it as a request for a new package in Ubuntu. As a part of the managing needs-packaging bug reports specification, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/NeedsPackagingBugs, all needs- packaging bug reports have