[Bug 1155343] Re: [needs-packaging] New package ibus-cangjie

2013-04-03 Thread Didier Roche
NEWed now ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155343 Title: [needs-packaging] New package ibus-cangjie To manage

[Bug 1155343] Re: [needs-packaging] New package ibus-cangjie

2013-04-02 Thread Daniel Holbach
It seems like somebody uploaded this already... updating the bug. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155343 Title:

[Bug 1155343] Re: [needs-packaging] New package ibus-cangjie

2013-03-27 Thread ZhengPeng Hou
since its a initial upload, can we revise the changelog to have only the initial entry? and also the version number of the package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155343 Title:

[Bug 1155343] Re: [needs-packaging] New package ibus-cangjie

2013-03-25 Thread Anthony Wong
Thanks bochecha for fixing the licensing issue. I updated the upstream source from bochecha's git, and uploaded to my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~anthonywong/+archive/ime/+files/ibus- cangjie_0.0.1~git20130325-0ubuntu1.dsc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1155343] Re: [needs-packaging] New package ibus-cangjie

2013-03-25 Thread Anthony Wong
Corrected a bug in copyright file, now is https://launchpad.net/~anthonywong/+archive/ime/+files/ibus- cangjie_0.0.1~git20130325-0ubuntu2.dsc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155343

[Bug 1155343] Re: [needs-packaging] New package ibus-cangjie

2013-03-24 Thread Mathieu Bridon
Good catch on the licensing Sebastien. I'm not a licensing expert either, but it does appear like I had at least made something of a mess by bundling that file, if not made something completely illegal. To avoid any potential issue, I took the easy way out and dropped the bundle copy of

[Bug 1155343] Re: [needs-packaging] New package ibus-cangjie

2013-03-22 Thread Sebastien Bacher
since libcangjie has made its way to raring, I started reviewed pycangjie and ibus-cangjie, I've an issue with this source though: - the code is under LGPL3 - but it also has a copy of a LGPL2.1 source: src/pycanberra.py (that's a 2.1 and not 2.1+) since that copy is a private/modified version,

[Bug 1155343] Re: [needs-packaging] New package ibus-cangjie

2013-03-22 Thread Sebastien Bacher
(out of that licensing issue the source seems fine for NEW, we should sort that question out before uploading though) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155343 Title: [needs-packaging]

[Bug 1155343] Re: [needs-packaging] New package ibus-cangjie

2013-03-17 Thread Stefano Rivera
FFe granted, together with LP: #1155339. Before beta 2 freeze, please. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155343 Title:

[Bug 1155343] Re: [needs packaging] New package ibus-cangjie

2013-03-15 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: needs-packaging ** Summary changed: - [needs packaging] New package ibus-cangjie + [needs-packaging] New package ibus-cangjie -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155343

[Bug 1155343] Re: [needs packaging] New package ibus-cangjie

2013-03-14 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source packages so that people