[Bug 1161800] Re: Please update LaTeXila to 2.8 (stable) version

2013-08-13 Thread Matthieu Baerts
Hello and thank you for this bug report. But if I understand well the problem, this bug is not due to LaTeXila (the editor) but with LaTeX. If yes, please ask your question on a forum about LaTeX ;-) (e.g. http://tex.stackexchange.com/ ). If no, if this bug is due to the editor, please open a n

[Bug 1161800] Re: Please update LaTeXila to 2.8 (stable) version

2013-08-12 Thread Sione Paea
hi guys, need help. I have a problem in my latexila. I have four authors in my article, the second and the last authors have the same affiliation but latexila display "this is revtex4-1: Assuming \noaffiliation for AUTHOR NAME." The pdf output put the last two authors in the same affilation. An

[Bug 1161800] Re: Please update LaTeXila to 2.8 (stable) version

2013-05-26 Thread Matthieu Baerts
This new version (2.8.1) is now available on Ubuntu repositories (Universe) and on LaTeXila's ppa (only for Saucy users because the latest stable versions of Valac and GtkSourceView are only available on Ubuntu 13.10). Note that the 'Daily' ppa has been re-enabled: https://launchpad.net/~latexila/

[Bug 1161800] Re: Please update LaTeXila to 2.8 (stable) version

2013-04-29 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: latexila (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1161800 Title: P

[Bug 1161800] Re: Please update LaTeXila to 2.8 (stable) version

2013-04-03 Thread Sébastien Wilmet
Yes, it's correct. There are not a lot of changes in latexila 2.8, but one of the bigger changes is for the completion, and it would not be possible with gsv 3.6, since most of the improvements are in gsv 3.8. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1161800] Re: Please update LaTeXila to 2.8 (stable) version

2013-04-03 Thread Matthieu Baerts
You can also ask to Sébastien if it's possible to have a version which can be compiled with Valac 0.18 and GTKSourceView 3.6 ;) But I guess it's not on his TODO list. @swilmet: is it correct? :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 1161800] Re: Please update LaTeXila to 2.8 (stable) version

2013-04-03 Thread Vasco Alves
Yeah, I see this isn't getting an exception. I do hope you manage to get it into the PPA though, as I use LaTeXila quite heavily and I would like the new version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 1161800] Re: Please update LaTeXila to 2.8 (stable) version

2013-03-30 Thread Matthieu Baerts
PS: this new version of LaTeXila needs Valac 0.20.0 which has been released 2 days ago... (and of course this new version is not already packaged) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1161800

[Bug 1161800] Re: Please update LaTeXila to 2.8 (stable) version

2013-03-30 Thread Matthieu Baerts
PS²: and it also needs gtksourceview 3.8.0 (which has been released at the beginning of this week) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1161800 Title: Please update LaTeXila to 2.8 (stable)

[Bug 1161800] Re: Please update LaTeXila to 2.8 (stable) version

2013-03-30 Thread Matthieu Baerts
Hello and thank you for this bug report. Unfortunately, it's too late to upload this new version in Raring. Maybe a FeatureFreeze Exceptions process can be introduced but I guess it's too late (one month after the Feature Freeze and less than one month before the release). I'll update the officia