** Branch linked: lp:debian/autopkgtest
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175557
Title:
adt-run fulfills dependencies with --built-tree contrary to the
manpage
To manage
This bug was fixed in the package autopkgtest - 2.6.1
---
autopkgtest (2.6.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* adt-virt-lxc: Call lxc-config through sudo as well like all the other LXC
commands. This fixes running adt-run as user with the LXC runner.
* adt-run: For copydown(),
In the first case, then it fulfils the facter test dependency from the
archive. , there is no bug. --built-tree merely means it will not take
the locally built *.debs to fulfill dependencies, not that it won't
install the test dependencies at all; the latter would not make any
sense. This is
I'm trying to understand how these arguments actually work, keeping my
notes here. Probably not interesting to anyone else, but maybe for me
for future reference.
unbuilt-tree
--unbuilt-tree . --binary ../testpkg_1_all.deb → build needed for binaries,
builds package, installs adt
Martin Pitt writes ([Bug 1175557] Re: adt-run fulfills dependencies with
--built-tree contrary to the manpage):
I'm trying to understand how these arguments actually work, keeping my
notes here. Probably not interesting to anyone else, but maybe for me
for future reference.
Do you want me
I now added a selftest for --binary with --built-tree to capture this
behaviour:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git;a=commitdiff;h=a456b
This accompanies the already existing one for --binary with --unbuilt-
tree.
** Changed in: autopkgtest (Ubuntu)
Status:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 04:22:06PM -, Ian Jackson wrote:
Do you want me to try to explain how I think they're supposed to
work ?
Please! I said this to pitti on IRC earlier:
11:10 rbasak pitti: incidentally, I find the manpage very confusing
and ambiguous whenever I'm trying to understand
I clarified (hopefully) the manpage:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git;a=commitdiff;h=0dcce04
Please let me know if something is still unclear and you have further
ideas how to improve it (or questions about the behaviour).
** Changed in: autopkgtest (Ubuntu)
Hey Ian,
oh, you are listening here, nice! I'd appreciate if you could review
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git;a=commitdiff;h=0dcce04
; I'm fairly sure that this reflects how adt-run currently works, and
that it mostly makes sense that way. If you think the
Martin Pitt writes ([Bug 1175557] Re: adt-run fulfills dependencies with
--built-tree contrary to the manpage):
oh, you are listening here, nice!
Sure. To be honest I'm not doing very much but I can try to clear up
any misunderstandings and help explain the tangles in my code...
I'd
Robie Basak writes (Re: [Bug 1175557] Re: adt-run fulfills dependencies with
--built-tree contrary to the manpage):
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 04:22:06PM -, Ian Jackson wrote:
Do you want me to try to explain how I think they're supposed to
work ?
Please! I said this to pitti on IRC
** Changed in: autopkgtest (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175557
Title:
adt-run fulfills dependencies with --built-tree contrary to the
** Attachment added: debian/tests/control
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/+bug/1175557/+attachment/3662462/+files/control
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
failure-case.log contains the output of adt-run --built-tree
facter-1.6.10 --- adt-virt-schroot saucy-amd64. Note that apt-get
downloaded facter from the archive. From the manpage, I expect this not
to happen.
In case it's relevant, my facter-1.6.10 is actually an unbuilt tree. But
my test
14 matches
Mail list logo
