On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 01:12:48AM -, Antonio19 wrote:
This is the result libked libraries in libcairo2
$ ldd /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2
linux-vdso.so.1 = (0x7fffa47ff000)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f2fb0515000)
libpixman-1.so.0 =
This is not a bug in Ubuntu. If you put a library on the system library
directories, you need to expect that it will be used in linker
resolution. There's no way to magically have half your applications
look at one, and the other half another, since linking is done by raw
SONAME, not full path.
Trouble is that these libraries have different names and are all
present. It should be to the applications to decide whatever library
they want to use and the system shoud not interfere in any way. Albeit
it looks like there is some weird interferences for some applications.
The new libpng
Well after posting the explanation of what I have done about libpng12
and libpng16 and reading from Chow Loong Jin (hyperair) that his
analysys of MONO points him to :
Mono: DllImport error loading library: '/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0: version
`PNG12_0' not found
I tried to remove the symbolic link
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:37:13PM -, Antonio19 wrote:
[...]
Can you you please update the status of this bug to Fixed instead of
Invalid ? Thanks.
No. We don't support cases where you install random libraries into system
locations and break your system. Therefore your bug is invalid, and
Eveything is working fine in my system and I don't consider it broken.
My point of view is that Ubuntu is sticking with its system build to
antique version of libraries. I obviously don't know the full reason
why? This should in part comes from some developper / packager whom
chose to ignore the
There's nothing wrong with installing a library with a different SOVER
(as you did), there's everything wrong with then linking the old SOVER
to the new one. That was (as you discovered) your only mistake here.
It's perfectly fine to have multiple versions installed.
Debian and Ubuntu will move
Thank you for your quick answer. Yes I did not attach the MONO_LOG_LEVEL
log, here it is.
Well the Ubuntu Updates for Partial upgrade was not related to Banshee
but to a wine 1.6 rc1 and today rc2 which sports 2 same binaries
(executable files in /usr/bin/) in 2 different packages ... coming
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:54:33PM -, Antonio19 wrote:
Thank you for your quick answer. Yes I did not attach the MONO_LOG_LEVEL
log, here it is.
Judging from the following line...
| Mono: DllImport error loading library: '/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0:
version `PNG12_0' not found (required by
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:48:43AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:54:33PM -, Antonio19 wrote:
Thank you for your quick answer. Yes I did not attach the MONO_LOG_LEVEL
log, here it is.
Judging from the following line...
| Mono: DllImport error loading
This is the result libked libraries in libcairo2
$ ldd /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2
linux-vdso.so.1 = (0x7fffa47ff000)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f2fb0515000)
libpixman-1.so.0 = /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpixman-1.so.0
(0x7f2fb027e000)
The previously reported bug marked later as Invalid was :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/717850
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191195
Title:
Cannot launch
Could I have the full output of the invocation with MONO_LOG_LEVEL
please? It looks like it isn't present in the attachment.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191195
Title:
Cannot
** Changed in: banshee (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191195
Title:
Cannot launch banshee: Unhandled Exception:
14 matches
Mail list logo
