It seems safer indeed if qtmultimedia-touch and qtmultimedia share the
same source level.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1219695
Title:
[FFe] Qt 5.1.1
To manage notifications about
It'd be good actually to also bump qtmultimedia to use the released
5.1.1 version, as the fork one is based on 5.1.1 as well.
That way we know the version used by touch shares the same base from the
original package available in the archive.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
I disagree. The forked qtmultimedia was allowed on the basis of it's
use case being completely disjoint from the desktop package. We only
let qtwebkit in on it's own after testing to verify that there were no
regressions and that specific bugs seen in Ubuntu were fixed. Nack on
updating
That's it, right?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1219695
Title:
[FFe] Qt 5.1.1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix
** Changed in: qtdeclarative-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This bug was fixed in the package qtwebkit-opensource-src -
5.1.1-1ubuntu2
---
qtwebkit-opensource-src (5.1.1-1ubuntu2) saucy; urgency=low
* Drop libwebp-dev dependency and disable it, not in main.
-- Timo Jyrinki timo-jyri...@ubuntu.com Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:18:00 +0300
**
It surfaced there is also possibility for qtmultimedia, tested
separately by the multimedia team. Let's see if we get it in still
today.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1219695
Title:
qtmultimedia or qtmultimedia-fork?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1219695
Title:
[FFe] Qt 5.1.1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
After some tinkering, it looks like what would be wanted would be
https://code.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/phablet-extras/qtmultimedia-
touch - it seems it's indeed a fork with different package names as
well. I originally thought it'd be just some simple patches.
--
You received this bug
Ok, so no qtmultimedia under this FFe. The 5.0.2 stays in the archive.
If there'll be a GStreamer 1.0 supporting renamed qtmultimedia-touch,
it'll be under different FFe.
** Changed in: qtxmlpatterns-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix
** Changed in:
We start final beta freeze on Friday. This needs to happen before then
or not at all (frankly, I think it's probably too late already).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1219695
Title:
Yes, sorry for not yet updating this earlier, too many things in flight.
The amount of unfixed regressions and so many other things to land has
lead us to (unfortunately) postpone Qt 5.1 until t-series opens. We're
trying to get QtWebkit 5.1.1 alone in, compiled against 5.0.2, which has
been now
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: qtquickcontrols-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: qtdoc-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1219695
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: qtx11extras-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
OK. I think we should include updating pkg-kde-tools in this FFe and
keep the overall diff down. From a release perspective, I think this
update makes sense. Are the product managers for ubuntu-desktop and
touch on board with this? This will affect both their efforts so I
think they should
** Branch linked: lp:~mitya57/ubuntu/saucy/pkg-kde-tools/merge
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1219695
Title:
[FFe] Qt 5.1.1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Description changed:
Dear Release Team,
I'd like to request FFe for Qt 5.1.1 and its release modules. It was
discussed during vUDS
(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/client-1308-qt51) and the
consensus was that we would be better off with 5.1.1 than staying with
I'm good with the switch as long as we perform proper testing and can
validate that both manual image testing and autopilot testing don't turn
up any significant issues.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Useful for Unity and Kubuntu, issue well researched with an eye to
problems, thanks for a good FFe request, approved.
** Changed in: qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: qtdeclarative-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in:
The NEW packages qtquickcontrols, qtwebkit-examples and qtx11extras are
newly released modules by upstream, and would be useful to have in
universe. qtdoc existed before but was not uploaded to Ubuntu before -
it's useful to have complete offline documentation.
--
You received this bug
Syncing the new packages from Debian is fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1219695
Title:
[FFe] Qt 5.1.1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Attachment added: Qt_5.1.1_changelogs.tar.xz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtx11extras-opensource-src/+bug/1219695/+attachment/3798883/+files/Qt_5.1.1_changelogs.tar.xz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Attachment added: Qt_5.1.1_ubuntu-sdk_dist-upgrade.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtx11extras-opensource-src/+bug/1219695/+attachment/3798884/+files/Qt_5.1.1_ubuntu-sdk_dist-upgrade.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Description changed:
Dear Release Team,
I'd like to request FFe for Qt 5.1.1 and its release modules. It was
discussed during vUDS
(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/client-1308-qt51) and the
consensus was that we would be better off with 5.1.1 than staying with
** Description changed:
Dear Release Team,
I'd like to request FFe for Qt 5.1.1 and its release modules. It was
discussed during vUDS
(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/client-1308-qt51) and the
consensus was that we would be better off with 5.1.1 than staying with
All of the packages listed as being in Debian New are out and accepted into
Debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1219695
Title:
[FFe] Qt 5.1.1
To manage notifications about this
No, I don't see downsides to updating pkg-kde-tools. The delta is
essentially this commit http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-kde/pkg-
kde-tools.git;a=commitdiff;h=bd3ddd5ae38ee392f10ac7f255676372f14d63b7
since Ubuntu already has 0.15.7ubuntu4. 0.15.8ubuntu1 would thus be
needed:
The NEW
28 matches
Mail list logo
