** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Raring)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Saucy)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Hi Joe,
IMHO this can be marked as invalid. It was just a FUD created when
hunting down the actual issue (which has been wonderfully solved thanks
to your patience).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks for the update, Phill
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Raring)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Saucy)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Joe, I've just had a thought as zram is actually a compressed area
of RAM and not a physical device, why would we expect parted to
recognise what is going on? As far as I can read, it is actually
reporting things entirely correctly.
parted is a disk partitioning and partition resizing
Hi,
I agree with phillw. This message from parted listing option will show in any
GNU/Linux distribution, with any kernel when zram is loaded and working,
because it's not a logical volume, it is a block device which acts as swap. See
the description at the page of the project:
It seems I made a mess of installing the 3.11.4 kernel... It now seems
to support zram.. I also re-installed the 3.12.rc1 kernel. both show the
parted -l error. Details below:
phillw@piglet:~$ uname -a
Linux piglet 3.11.4-031104-generic #201310051136 SMP Sat Oct 5 15:38:11 UTC
2013 x86_64 x86_64
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Raring)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Saucy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Raring)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Raring)
Importance:
Thanks for reporting this bug. It's good to know that this is already
fixed in the 3.12 kernel. We can perform a Reverse kernel bisect to
identify the commit that fixes this in 3.12 and then request it be
included in the stable releases(3.11, 3.8).
It would first be good to know if the fix was
Hi Joe,
phillw@piglet:~$ uname -a
Linux piglet 3.11.4-031104-generic #201310051136 SMP Sat Oct 5 15:38:11 UTC
2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
phillw@piglet:~$ swapon -s
FilenameTypeSizeUsedPriority
/dev/sda6
ignore the ps -ef, it is a red herring!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1235525
Title:
error on sudo parted -l
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
That may be possible. That 3.11.4 kernel is using the standard Saucy
config file. How do you go about testing the 3.12 mainline kernel to
know it does not exhibit the bug? Is there a lubuntu ISO pre-built with
this kernel?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
zram is called by an upstart job in lubuntu. I'll re-check to see if
zram swap is enabled with the 3.12 kernel, but it will be tomorrow.
Regards,
Phill.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
$ sudo parted -l
Model: ATA MAXTOR 6L040J2 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 40.0GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Number Start End SizeType File system Flags
1 32.3kB 9665MB 9665MB primary ext4boot
2 9665MB 10.7GB 1078MB
I'm seeing this as well
$ uname -a
Linux lubuntu 3.11.0-11-generic #17-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 1 19:42:04 UTC 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1235525
14 matches
Mail list logo
