Public bug reported:

I've looked at the CPU, wakeup event and current drawn on a LG Nexus 4
comparing the Mir enabled and non-Mir versions of Unity8 with today's
image + updates (at 18:00 UTC, 7th Oct 2013).

I ran a 5 minute idle soak test with the screen set to be un-blanked at
full brightness and measured the current drawn at 0.5 second intervals.
The Mir enabled version of Unity is drawing on average ~143.7mA where as
the non-Mir version is drawing 138.7mA, or around 5mA less current
(~3.6% difference)

Measuring CPU load (just Mir)
Mir:
  0.70% user,    0.63% system,   1.33% total CPU usage
Non-Mir:
  0.17% user,   0.07% system,   0.23% total CPU usage


Context Switches:
Mir:
    219.24 context switches/sec
Non-Mir:
    22.32 context switches/sec

poll/epoll/nanosleeps 
Mir:
   4.9664/sec
Non-Mir:
   3.1333/sec


Total CPU of system:
Mir:
   0.87%
Non-Mir:
   0.70%

So it seems that the Mir variant of Unity8 is busier and consumes more
power than the non-Mir variety when idle.

** Affects: unity8 (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Package changed: ubuntu => unity8 (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1236508

Title:
  unity8 (+Mir) draws more current and uses more CPU than non-Mir
  variant

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1236508/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to