[Bug 1259153] Re: [MIR] schroot

2014-04-01 Thread Colin Watson
Moved to main per #9 and #10, now that the hardening fixes are in place. ** Changed in: schroot (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1259153

[Bug 1259153] Re: [MIR] schroot

2014-04-01 Thread Colin Watson
I uploaded a fix for the hardening problems, currently waiting in the unapproved queue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1259153 Title: [MIR] schroot To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1259153] Re: [MIR] schroot

2014-03-25 Thread Seth Arnold
I reviewed schroot version 1.6.8-1 as checked into trusty. This should not be considered a full security review but rather a quick gauge of maintainability. - schroot provides a setuid mechanism to allow unprivileged users to access predefined chroot environments, especially useful for managing

[Bug 1259153] Re: [MIR] schroot

2014-02-05 Thread Marc Deslauriers
** Changed in: schroot (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => Seth Arnold (seth-arnold) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1259153 Title: [MIR] schroot To man

[Bug 1259153] Re: [MIR] schroot (and lockdev)

2014-01-13 Thread Matthias Klose
lockdev isn't needed anymore ** Changed in: lockdev (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1259153 Title: [MIR] schroot To manage notifications

[Bug 1259153] Re: [MIR] schroot (and lockdev)

2014-01-13 Thread Matthias Klose
1.6.8-1 now uses hardening defaults. looks ok, pending the security review ** Summary changed: - [MIR] schroot (and lockdev) + [MIR] schroot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1259153 Ti

[Bug 1259153] Re: [MIR] schroot (and lockdev)

2013-12-15 Thread Roger Leigh
Please see http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/schroot/schroot_1.6.6-1.dsc (distribution of git commit fe9f3fa on schroot-1.6). It should cover most of the points raised above (with the exception of symbols files). Is there anything additional you'd like in this release (either missing stuff, stuff

[Bug 1259153] Re: [MIR] schroot (and lockdev)

2013-12-15 Thread Roger Leigh
Regarding the timescale, schroot development isn't really done in mind for Ubuntu freezes. The 1.7.x series is being (roughly) aimed at jessie for a stable 1.8 release. However, we can certainly try to accomodate them. Note that I have backported the lockdev removal to schroot 1.6. cmake buildi

[Bug 1259153] Re: [MIR] schroot (and lockdev)

2013-12-15 Thread Roger Leigh
All the above is on the schroot-1.6 git branch; 1.7 is on the master branch. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1259153 Title: [MIR] schroot (and lockdev) To manage notifications about t

[Bug 1259153] Re: [MIR] schroot (and lockdev)

2013-12-11 Thread Matthias Klose
> Note that current development (1.7.x releases, in experimental) > have dropped the lockdev dependency. is there an estimate for the upload to unstable in time before the trusty feature freeze? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1259153] Re: [MIR] schroot (and lockdev)

2013-12-11 Thread Matthias Klose
schroot: - missing a symbols file - not built using hardening defaults - not using verbose build (hiding that it is built without hardening defaults) (optional) - doesn't cross build (wishlist) - would be nice to build it in parallel (wishlist) assigning to the security team for security rev

[Bug 1259153] Re: [MIR] schroot (and lockdev)

2013-12-11 Thread Matthias Klose
lockdev: - missing a symbols file - not built using hardening defaults (note that explicit build flags are hardcoded for the perl-lib target) - not multiarched (optional) - would be nice to cross-build, and have stage1 support (not (cross-)building the perl bits) (wishlist) maybe not necessa

[Bug 1259153] Re: [MIR] schroot (and lockdev)

2013-12-10 Thread Roger Leigh
Note that current development (1.7.x releases, in experimental) have dropped the lockdev dependency. And we're actively removing the lockdev rdeps to allow lockdev removal for jessie. We also updated to dh9 and cmake for building. Regards, Roger -- You received this bug notification because yo