[Bug 1286182] Re: package nginx-full 1.1.19-1ubuntu0.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2

2015-06-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for nginx (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286182

[Bug 1286182] Re: package nginx-full 1.1.19-1ubuntu0.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2

2015-06-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for nginx (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nginx in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1286182] Re: package nginx-full 1.1.19-1ubuntu0.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2

2015-04-25 Thread Thomas Ward
Hello. It looks like your init script has a syntax error on it. If this is still a problem, then please include the /etc/init.d/nginx script and attach it to this bug. The error indicates that /etc/init.d/nginx has a lot of things it shouldn't have in it, which would explain why it's failing to

[Bug 1286182] Re: package nginx-full 1.1.19-1ubuntu0.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2

2015-04-25 Thread Thomas Ward
Hello. It looks like your init script has a syntax error on it. If this is still a problem, then please include the /etc/init.d/nginx script and attach it to this bug. The error indicates that /etc/init.d/nginx has a lot of things it shouldn't have in it, which would explain why it's failing to

[Bug 1286182] Re: package nginx-full 1.1.19-1ubuntu0.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2

2014-03-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nginx in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1286182] Re: package nginx-full 1.1.19-1ubuntu0.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2

2014-03-08 Thread bradford
Linux odroid 3.4.75 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Jan 5 12:04:19 CST 2014 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux it says amd64 which is prolly the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nginx in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1286182] Re: package nginx-full 1.1.19-1ubuntu0.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2

2014-03-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286182 Title:

[Bug 1286182] Re: package nginx-full 1.1.19-1ubuntu0.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2

2014-03-08 Thread bradford
Linux odroid 3.4.75 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Jan 5 12:04:19 CST 2014 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux it says amd64 which is prolly the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286182 Title:

[Bug 1286182] Re: package nginx-full 1.1.19-1ubuntu0.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2

2014-02-28 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross