[Bug 1313311] Re: Broken libscrypt.so symlink

2017-02-22 Thread Robie Basak
Please see https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/02/22/%23ubuntu- release.html#t14:35 for some further discussion on this with another ~ubuntu-sru member. Following that discussion: 1) The problem appears to be theoretical at this point, since libscrypt has never been updated in an existing stable rele

[Bug 1313311] Re: Broken libscrypt.so symlink

2017-02-22 Thread Robie Basak
> If there's any update to the library, other packages don't pick it up. Right, but as you point out, this upload won't fix this. > In the end it's mostly to help people building their own packages on Ubuntu against libscrypt to do it correct and in the manner you'd expect an Ubuntu system to beh

[Bug 1313311] Re: Broken libscrypt.so symlink

2017-02-08 Thread Philipp Kern
The implication is that packages built against scrypt on trusty link against it statically. It's a grave Debian policy violation for one, it's a terrible thing for a security-related library for another. If there's any update to the library, other packages don't pick it up. It's also clear that it

[Bug 1313311] Re: Broken libscrypt.so symlink

2017-02-08 Thread Robie Basak
This would changing anything that builds now to building against the shared library instead of the static library, right? What are the implications of this? This should really be discussed in Regression Potential. Second, what's the real world impact of this? Why is there a need to SRU this? What

[Bug 1313311] Re: Broken libscrypt.so symlink

2017-02-01 Thread Philipp Kern
** Changed in: libscrypt (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Description changed: - libscrypt.so is a broken symlink: + [ Impact ] - $ file /usr/lib/libscrypt.so - /usr/lib/libscrypt.so: broken symbolic link to `debian/tmp/usr/lib/libscrypt.so.0' + libscrypt-dev ships a

[Bug 1313311] Re: Broken libscrypt.so symlink

2017-02-01 Thread Philipp Kern
Debdiff to fix this in trusty attached. ** Patch added: "libscrypt_1-2ubuntu2_1-2ubuntu2.14.04.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libscrypt/+bug/1313311/+attachment/4811710/+files/libscrypt_1-2ubuntu2_1-2ubuntu2.14.04.1.debdiff ** Changed in: libscrypt (Ubuntu Trusty)

[Bug 1313311] Re: Broken libscrypt.so symlink

2017-02-01 Thread Philipp Kern
As it turns out the side-effect of this is that binaries linking against scrypt are picking it up statically because there's a libscrypt.a that works. ** Also affects: libscrypt (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Bug 1313311] Re: Broken libscrypt.so symlink

2015-09-01 Thread Cory Bloor
This is still broken in Ubuntu 14.04 (1-2ubuntu2). Was that an oversight? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313311 Title: Broken libscrypt.so symlink To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1313311] Re: Broken libscrypt.so symlink

2014-12-24 Thread Logan Rosen
This bug was fixed in the package libscrypt - 1.20-1 --- libscrypt (1.20-1) experimental; urgency=low * ACK NMUs, thanks for the fixes. * New upstream release (Closes: #746041). - Drop patches from NMUs due to inclusion of equivalent changes upstream. * Add myself as co-main

[Bug 1313311] Re: Broken libscrypt.so symlink

2014-10-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: libscrypt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313311 Title:

[Bug 1313311] Re: Broken libscrypt.so symlink

2014-04-27 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: libscrypt (Debian) Status: Unknown => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313311 Title: Broken libscrypt.so symlink To manage notifications about this