[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2009-05-19 Thread Pete Ryland
The problem for me is that it uses too much memory. Using a 1.5GB resident set (of 3.0GB total virtual) on a 2GB system means that everything else has to use swap, even if you're at +19 nice. And when IO is highly-contended already, even swap is slower than usual. It's actually so bad I'm losing

Re: [Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2008-02-20 Thread Martin Pool
On 20/02/2008, Thom Pischke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, --reindex didn't seem to help anything. In my experience thus far > on hardy, tracker is usually either indexing or displaying the '!' > symbol, so I've just uninstalled. Same. -- Martin -- Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2008-02-20 Thread Thom Pischke
Well, --reindex didn't seem to help anything. In my experience thus far on hardy, tracker is usually either indexing or displaying the '!' symbol, so I've just uninstalled. -- Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132320 You received

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2008-02-16 Thread Thom Pischke
No, haven't bothered reporting it, figured it was just alpha hiccups. I'll try --reindex and see if it behaves itself, though if there are really corrupt DBs from earlier versions, seems like the package update ought to trigger a reindex automatically. -- Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU eve

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2008-02-16 Thread Jamie McCracken
Thom, have you reported the crashes in trackerd? (crashes in tracker-extract are irrelevant as it will self destruct if it takes too much memory or takes too long to extract metadata this is a deliberate feature and not a bug!) wrt not working - this could be because of bugs in the DB from 0.6.

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2008-02-16 Thread Thom Pischke
For me, tracker crashes at least daily on hardy, but maybe that's because it's still alpha. Tracker is definitely a net-minus for daily use in hardy right now, will probably just uninstall it at some point if it doesn't stabilize. Most of the time when I try to actually use it, it doesn't work an

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2008-02-16 Thread Jamie McCracken
if trackerd is not shut down cleanly it will call sqlite to do a corruption check. This corruption check is very cpu heavy and Im thinking about removing it due to the load it causes. -- Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132320 Y

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2008-02-16 Thread Andrew Frank
i have a new installation with 8.04 hardy: same problem: tracker consumes all cpu (despite saying it is in state 'sleeping'). this is after the system was sitting idle for a day, thus all available files should have been indexed. please fix, or make it at least not default setting: it is a huge

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2007-11-30 Thread Зоран Рилак
Running trackerd 0.6.3 with indexing and watching enabled at throttle level 20, it gets stuck and uses ~90% of one core perhaps a minute or two after launching. strace shows the following output: poll([{fd=11, events=POLLIN}, {fd=16, events=POLLIN}, {fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 3, 1998) = 0 gettimeo

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2007-11-14 Thread Alex Cornejo
The problem still persists on my machine with the latest updates, why is the status fixed released? -- Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is t

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2007-10-31 Thread Keith Hughitt
I had a similar problem this afternoon. tracker was using up between 40-48% of the cpu power, and was slowly the system down very visibly. After adjusting tracker-settings for lower cpu usage, the problem seemed to be alleviated. A check at the tracker log showed showed a huge stream of errors f

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2007-10-13 Thread M
Trackerd consumes a lot of CPU mainly when I'm downloading something. I notice it most obviously when using KTorrent. It's as if trackerd sees the change to some blocks of the file and has to rescan the whole thing, over and over again. Since the file is continually modified, as long as anything

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2007-09-28 Thread Martin Pitt
tracker (0.6.3-0ubuntu1) gutsy; urgency=low [ Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ] * New upstream release (LP: #130794, #131983, #132320, #137352, #138331, #139173, #132505, #131559, #131735, #132710, #133246, #137873, #138778. * debian/patches/01-version_fix.patch, debian/patches/02-getenv.patc

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2007-09-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Retargeting as this won't make Beta release. We will upload a new tracker release with a fix for this right after beta release, when the freeze isn't in place anymore. ** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu) Target: ubuntu-7.10-beta => ubuntu-7.10-rc -- Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2007-09-18 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Jamie is releasing 0.6.3 this week (possibly on 20th). I'll take care of packaging it. ** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Emilio Pozuelo Monfort -- Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132320 You received

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2007-09-13 Thread Jamie McCracken
Fixed in svn (option is not live yet though so will only take effect when tracker is restarted - will make options live very soon) ** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled https://bugs.launch

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2007-09-07 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical Target: None => ubuntu-7.10-beta -- Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2007-09-05 Thread Jamie McCracken
we will fix this soon... (I dont have permission to change priority) -- Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. --

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2007-09-05 Thread blokeinlondon
Can someone set the priority for bug to critical -- Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 132320] Re: Tracker consumes more then 90% of CPU even when indexing is disabled

2007-09-03 Thread Martijn van de Streek
I've killed trackerd (SIGKILL, as SIGTERM doesn't work), so I don't know what tracker-status would've told me.. but I told tracker not to index or watch, so it shouldn't be doing any of these things (I don't think it should even start if both are disabled, it's kind of pointless to have it running