Following Debian as I don't think it's appropriate for Ubuntu to diverge
from Debian on this point. We'll follow whatever Debian does.
** Changed in: haproxy (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Following Debian as I don't think it's appropriate for Ubuntu to diverge
from Debian on this point. We'll follow whatever Debian does.
** Changed in: haproxy (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
** Changed in: haproxy (Debian)
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to haproxy in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325847
Title:
Improvement: initscript enhancement with support for
** Changed in: haproxy (Debian)
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325847
Title:
Improvement: initscript enhancement with support for conf.d and
Thanks!
** Also affects: haproxy (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750459
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Tags removed: needs-upstream-report
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
** Changed in: haproxy (Debian)
Status: Unknown = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to haproxy in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325847
Title:
Improvement: initscript enhancement with support for
Thanks!
** Also affects: haproxy (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750459
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Tags removed: needs-upstream-report
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: haproxy (Debian)
Status: Unknown = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325847
Title:
Improvement: initscript enhancement with support for conf.d and
The attachment patch for current haproxy init.d script seems to be a
patch. If it isn't, please remove the patch flag from the attachment,
remove the patch tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-
reviewers, unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user
Also, I didn't check if the init.d script is provided by packaging or
comes directly from upstream. If it comes directly from upstream, then
sending the patch upstream directly would be best.
** Changed in: haproxy (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
You received this bug
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
haproxy in Ubuntu is currently identical to the Debian haproxy package
from which it is derived, so it seems likely to me that Debian will
benefit from this patch, too. I would also like to avoid the additional
I filed a bug with debian, perhaps it will get included in one of the next
releases:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750459
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #750459
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750459
--
You received this bug notification because
The attachment patch for current haproxy init.d script seems to be a
patch. If it isn't, please remove the patch flag from the attachment,
remove the patch tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-
reviewers, unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
haproxy in Ubuntu is currently identical to the Debian haproxy package
from which it is derived, so it seems likely to me that Debian will
benefit from this patch, too. I would also like to avoid the additional
Also, I didn't check if the init.d script is provided by packaging or
comes directly from upstream. If it comes directly from upstream, then
sending the patch upstream directly would be best.
** Changed in: haproxy (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
You received this bug
I filed a bug with debian, perhaps it will get included in one of the next
releases:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750459
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #750459
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750459
--
You received this bug notification because
16 matches
Mail list logo