*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1592229 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1592229
FYI, I fixed the 20.04 official ISO using rufus with a USB drive that my
machine could boot.
I thought I'd only used Ubuntu official, but apparently I'm using
https://github.com/hirotakaster/baytail-
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1592229 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1592229
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1592229
Install grub-efi-ia32 on i386/efi platforms
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Really wish this could get fixed for 16.10- I'm already running Ubuntu
Touch/Unity 8 on my phone, but this bug is keeping me from transitioning
my tablet over to Ubuntu. Sure, I can get it working with Debian as it's
built into the multiboot installer at this point, but only Unity 8 can
truly do
Sorry about the typo, should be pisses me off..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Sorry to say but this type of problem solving pushes me towards ...
Pishes me off.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed
To manage
Any progress?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Something found by Google https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2015/07/22
/why-cheap-systems-run-32-bit-uefi-on-x64-systems/
I tried also Fedora, no success.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This is a very serious issue, at least for me. I bought Asus Aspire
Switch 10 E and I've been fighting to install Linux to it. This has been
the closest one as a solution http://www.jfwhome.com/2014/03/07
/perfect-ubuntu-or-other-linux-on-the-asus-transformer-book-t100/ , but
bootia32.efi is a
As far as other distros go - can anyone confirm if any distros other
than Ubuntu have the signed kernel and UEFI bootloader required to
ensure Secure Boot can remain enabled on the machine? Not everyone will
necessarily be bothered by needing to disable Secure Boot, but some OEMs
make it pretty
This as been mentioned earlier in this thread (see comment #7), but just to
clarify :
* Debian Jessie i386 does work nicely on the Asus X205TA (cf.
https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/Asus/X205TA)
* Debian Jessie has been working since January 5, 2015 (cf.
On X205TA to my knowledge only 64-bit images of any distro have *ever*
worked for anyone in the community
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support
Regrading Debian multiarch, I can only boot into amd64 kernel instead of i386
kernel.
Is anyone able to boot into i386 kernel by UEFI BIOS 32-bit?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Debian testing multiarch work out of the box
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Problem have been seen and analysed pretty well about year ago. No
solution from Ubuntu group. Cloest one is this
http://askubuntu.com/questions/392719/32-bit-uefi-boot-support. My point
is that you have to be very advanced Linux user to use this workaround.
Can anyone recommend an other Linux
If Debían hace support, why not Ubuntu?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Confirmed, you have to replace the bootia32.efi when making USB, BUT when you
install from USB with the following method, it does boot:
Select: Try Ubuntu without installing
On the desktop click: Install Ubuntu
In the options choose: Erase the disk and install Ubuntu
(that option may not be
Using ubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso + the ia32 EFI GRUB from the multi-arch
Debian ISO can workaround this issue.
http://askubuntu.com/questions/392719/32-bit-uefi-boot-support
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/multi-arch/iso-cd/
--
You received this bug notification because you are
The file bootia32.efi is necessary I used it to boot Ubuntu 16.04, I
have bought my acer aspire switch 10 and I can't boot after install
it!!!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Today, using a USB that I made to live boot Ubuntu 16.04 (i posted in a
bootia32.efi file, but i didn't try to boot first, so maybe it wasn't
necessary as it was when i installed 14.04) on my Asus X205TA, I ran the
installer (erasing the disk) and allowed it to restart. The installation
booted! So
This also affects the Nextbook Flexx 11.6" tablet. I'm able to boot
Ubuntu Studio 15.10 from USB, after adding a 32-bit grub executable. I
can then install to a MicroSD card in the external slot, but the final
installation or update of grub fails, and the result isn't bootable.
Still trying to
Faced the problem today on a cheap surfpad from TrekStor. It is the
"TrekStor SurfTab wintron 7.0".
I had to copy the right EFI loader from a debian stick to my ubuntu
install stick.
Wouldn't it be much easier, when Ubuntu would just provide both EFI
loaders, which in turn use the same boot.cfg
This affects the Macbook 2,1 as well
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
The Acer ONE S1002 has the same 64 bit atom processor with 32 bit uefi,
now with 32 bit windows 10 installed. The saga continues.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit
Same thing on DEXP Ursus 10w. No IA-32 support by GRUB2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed
To manage notifications about this bug go
For install Ubuntu on the tablet oysters T104W also needs ia32 UEFI
loader.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed
To manage
ASUS EeeBook X205TA only supports 32-bit UEFI.
http://www.asus.com/Notebooks/ASUS_EeeBook_X205TA/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed
** Changed in: debian-installer
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed
To manage notifications about this
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #768461
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768461
** Also affects: debian-installer via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768461
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: live-build (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Thanks for replying! I have now fixed it, finally managed to learn
enough to follow the guides effectively. Clear info on this thread
helped to orient me so thank you! The aversion I feel to Windows is
really really strong. Everything about the Ubuntu environment I've
experienced makes me happy.
The 32-bit image will only work with Secure Boot turned off and legacy
or CSM boot enabled in your device's UEFI. I don't remember off the top
of my head if the X205TA offers this ability, but I'm pretty sure it
does.
You might be better off using Windows until 64-bit Ubuntu is stable,
tbh.
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Also affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: live-build (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/1341944
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
@jokker: You can boot 64-bit Ubuntu on the Switch 10 (or any other Bay
Trail Atom device) using 32-bit GRUB. You will need to compile GRUB
yourself. The easiest way to accomplish this is to copy the 32-bit UEFI
bootloader from a GParted LiveCD to your Ubuntu LiveUSB media, turn off
Secure Boot on
As a reference and a potential solution to some: The Debian 64-bit
netinstall image (but only that one for some reason!) works with a
32-bit UEFI.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Hello,
Just bought an Acer Switch 10, same issue... No way to boot anything. Anyone
successful so far?
Tried to disable everything related to booting in the BIOS, downgraded BIOS,
used rufus + jessie ISO...
Bought an OTG adaptor to have usb stick directly on the tablet micro usb
port...
Sorry, the command needs to be without -p /EFI/BOOT (that only applies if the
grub.cfg is there instead of in /boot/grub).
grub-mkimage -o bootia32.efi -O i386-efi ntfs hfs appleldr boot cat efi_gop
efi_uga elf fat hfsplus iso9660 linux keylayouts memdisk minicmd part_apple
ext2 extcmd xfs xnu
I'd also like to add my voice on having someone look into it. All it should
require is running grub-mkimage a second time with -o bootia32.efi -O i386-efi.
To summarize instructions found elsewhere to fix this yourself:
Install grub-efi-ia32-bin
Run something like (a bit unsure about which
I've the same issue. I'm using voyo mini PC http://en.myvoyo.com/index.html
I tried to install Ubuntu 13.10, 14.10 and 15.05 and follow the method mention
from the website, but result is same unable to boot from emmc.
I able to make Ubuntu boot from USB and installed to the emmc, but no
matter
I've got an aspire switch 10 and I have the same issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed
To manage notifications about this bug go
I've got a Dell Venue 8 Pro (with an Atom Z3735G) and I'm willing to
test. Feel free to get in touch with me when there is support for 32bit
UEFI. I really hope we could do this even for Vivid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Here is work from Debian developer and it installs Debian on X205:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/efi-development/jessie-
upload3/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Why Intel Bay Trail computers have only 32 Bit UEFI firmware... due to a
bug which was corrected in Windows:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Petition-Started-for-Intel-Atom-Bay-
Trail-Tablets-64-bit-and-Linux-Support-458872.shtml
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Same problem with Zotac ZBOX pico mini, unable to install a Debian based
distribution like Ubuntu because no bootia32.efi loader is available on
boot media.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Same problem here with new ASUS F205TA Notebook. BIOS supports only 32
Bit UEFI boot.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed
To manage
There are s many people with know how, who can make it run:
https://www.happyassassin.net/fedlet-a-fedora-remix-for-bay-trail-
tablets/
Why can't Ubuntu?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
After many tests I am really happy with this Fedora distribution called
Fedlet on my Dell Venue 8 Pro. Wifi, Sound, everything is working!
Please please please make this happen for Ubuntu :D
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Does anybody working on this ?
Maybe we could just realeaded a 14.04.1 updated spin ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed
To manage
I am a little shocked to be honest that no Linux distribution - and
especially Ubuntu - hasn't caught up to this. Especially since those
Intel Atom Laptops and Tablets are so very popular! Makes we wonder how
committed they still are and why this is ignored?
This seems such a simple thing to fix
So... it would be really nice if someone that was able to make this work
post the steps used to find success. As others have posted-- these atom
machines are not going away. I just purchased an ASUS X205TA for $139
and others will sell for $99 very soon. These are great machines for
field work
In case anyone wants to see an easy guide for getting a 32bit EFI grub
working:
https://github.com/lopaka/instructions/blob/master/ubuntu-14.10-install-
asus-x205ta.md
It worked perfectly for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
I can confirm being able to boot into an Ubuntu 14.10 64bit live usb by
manually adding a 32bit compiled grub2 on my Asus x205ta which has a
64bit Bay Trail Atom CPU but only supports 32bit EFI.
It was able to install ubuntu until the bootloader part. It installed a
64bit EFI bootloader but that
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 102 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102
Bug confirmed on HP Envy X2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 102
Ubuntu i386 images (install media) cannot boot in UEFI mode
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI
Bug #102 deals specifically with the 32-bit version of Ubuntu,
therefore this is not necessarily a duplicate of #102. This bug
report is about installing 64-bit Ubuntu on 64-bit machines with 32-bit
UEFI only. I am unmarking 102 as a duplicate, as that seems to be
complicating the
The current Linux kernel in Ubuntu 14.04 does support booting the
64-bit signed kernel from a 32-bit Grub EFI bootloader. I can confirm
this on at least two 32-bit UEFI devices, the ASUS Transformer T100TA
and the Acer Aspire Switch 10. Unfortunately, the lack of official
32-bit EFI bootloader
I have an Acer Switch 10 with a 32-bit UEFI. I installed 32-bit UEFI
GRUB and was able to boot 64-bit Ubuntu. It definitely was not 32-bit
Ubuntu - I was specifically using a 64-bit installer/LiveCD.
I can confirm definitively that a machine with 32-bit firmware can
absolutely boot a 64-bit
ETA: whether or not the 64-bit OS can make calls to the 32-bit UEFI
doesn't prevent the OS from booting.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
32-Bit UEFI bootloader support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2014 12:00 PM, ClairelyClaire wrote:
ETA: whether or not the 64-bit OS can make calls to the 32-bit
UEFI doesn't prevent the OS from booting.
Actually, it does. It has to call on the UEFI firmware to obtain the
system memory map. Then of
That's what we've been saying since this ticket - and others like it -
was filed.
It is *confirmed* to be possible to install a 32-bit UEFI GRUB and
install and boot a 64-bit kernel. It's been done multiple times, right
now by manually compiling and using a 32-bit UEFI GRUB bootloader. I
can't
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 102 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 102
Ubuntu i386 images (install media) cannot boot in UEFI mode
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
FYI, there are 2 Debian Boot CDs with 32 bit UEFI support:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/efi-development/upload4/
debian-wheezy-i386-efi-test4.iso and debian-wheezy-amd64-i386-MA-efi-
test4.iso will usually boot just fine on 32 bit UEFI machines that have
no legacy mode. Maybe
Even I can confirm the above mentioned bug..
I have recently purchased a NotionInk CAIN Tablet
It has the latest Intel Atom Z3735D Quad Core(Bay Trail) Processor
The tablet(Hybrid) comes pre-installed with 32-bit Windows 8.1
I have tried booting the 64 bit Ubuntu but it doesnt boot because of the
I can confirm that the new Odys Wintab 10 is also affected. Link to the
product page: http://www.odys.de/web/tablet-pc_wintab10_de.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
This is going to continue to be a problem. Its breadth will increase as
more and more people attempt to install Ubuntu on any Atom-based device.
The Intel Atom platform by design uses a 32-bit UEFI environment. These
devices ship with 32-bit Windows 8.1 installed, because 64-bit Windows
uses
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944
Title:
I can confirm this affects me as well. I have an Acer Switch 10 and an
Asus T100. Both of them have the same Intel Atom 64-bit processor, but
require a 32-bit bootloader in order to boot. These machines are UEFI
only and have no legacy BIOS support.
I was able to get Ubuntu 64-bit installed and
71 matches
Mail list logo
