[Bug 135881] Re: /bin/arch missing

2008-06-16 Thread Alexandre Otto Strube
There are sources in ubuntu's own repository who still depends on it (such as cryopid). -- /bin/arch missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@

[Bug 135881] Re: /bin/arch missing

2007-09-13 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- /bin/arch missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu

[Bug 135881] Re: /bin/arch missing

2007-08-30 Thread Daniel Holbach
Please don't assign to the Ubuntu Core Development team. ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Core Development Team => (unassigned) -- /bin/arch missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 135881] Re: /bin/arch missing

2007-08-30 Thread Oliver Grawert
from /usr/share/doc/util-linux/changelog.gz arch(1) is deprecated in favor of "uname -m" or arch(1) from coreutils (>= 6.9+). The util-linux-ng package doesn't build arch by default, you have to use the option --enable-arch. -- /bin/arch missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135881 You rece

[Bug 135881] Re: /bin/arch missing

2007-08-30 Thread Basilio Kublik
ok, so let's leave this here and hope the maintainer of the package will be kind enough to check this issue. ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Basilio Kublik => Ubuntu Core Development Team Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- /bin/arch missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

Re: [Bug 135881] Re: /bin/arch missing

2007-08-30 Thread plord
Basilio Kublik wrote, On 08/30/07 17:39: > this seems to be a natural progression of the application since there's > no point in include another binary that does the same as other already > installed and which have more features. > > I'm tempted to mark this bug as invalid, but i let the decision t

[Bug 135881] Re: /bin/arch missing

2007-08-30 Thread Basilio Kublik
this seems to be a natural progression of the application since there's no point in include another binary that does the same as other already installed and which have more features. I'm tempted to mark this bug as invalid, but i let the decision to you, since you could ask as wishlist item that t