** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel Mehrmann (daniel-mehrmann)
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
I build a personal Ubuntu PPA for this tools collection (e2fsprogs).
I did a snapshot of git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/ext2/e2fsprogs.git and
used the master trunk maint. I will update my personal PPA monthly or
if tytso tells me it's time to do so. :-)
I build deb packages for trusty, utopic and
** Branch linked: lp:~daniel-mehrmann/e2fsprogs/maint
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1365874
Title:
Ubuntu 14.04 does not support ext4 metadata checksumming
To manage notifications a
Note that there were bugs found that necessitated format changes for
metadata checksums in 3.18 --- which was released earlier this week.
E2fsprogs 1.43 hasn't been released yet, and e2fsprogs 1.42 has
***no support for metadata checksums.
People who are interested in testing metadata checks
I would love to help with testing of metadata_csum as match as possible.
Espesially becouse i waiting for this option so long time. But there are two
problem which make it hard to do:
- no e2fsprogs 1.43 package even on ppa.
- all systems are still created without 64bit enabled.
Before testing w
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1365874
Title:
Well, Ubuntu based on Debian (mostly testing stage).
If i'm looking here https://packages.qa.debian.org/e/e2fsprogs.html, we
can see that Debian has no support for extended etx4 features yet and
it looks like that take a while. Probably it was a little bit optimistic
to add such features to the r
Canonical doesn't employ any ext4 engineers, and as far as I know, no
Ubuntu developers contribute to ext4 development. So the fact the
release notes might get a few things wrong shouldn't be surprising.
Canonical simply doesn't have any file system developers on staff, as
far as I know.
If you
