Hello Vladimir, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gcc-10 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-10/10.3.0-1ubuntu1~20.04 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
htt
Hello Vladimir, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gcc-10 into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-10/10.3.0-1ubuntu1~20.10 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
This bug was fixed in the package gcc-11 - 11-20210310-1ubuntu1
---
gcc-11 (11-20210310-1ubuntu1) hirsute; urgency=medium
* Merge with Debian; remaining changes:
- Build from upstream sources.
gcc-11 (11-20210310-1) experimental; urgency=medium
* GCC snapshot, taken from the
** Package changed: gcc-defaults (Ubuntu) => gcc-11 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1405685
Title:
GCC manpage contains invalid "@tie{}" tags
To manage notifications about th
** Changed in: gcc-defaults (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1405685
Title:
GCC manpage contains invalid "@tie{}" tags
To manage notificatio
Thank you. I see now that the info page display things correctly.
I simply ran `info gcc` first, which at a closer glance seem to simply
load the manpage so that would exaplain why I saw it in #2.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
> Could you double-check this? They show up when I run `info gcc` here.
I double-checked that I have installed gcc-4.8-doc package and in
$ info g++-4.8 "Invoking GCC" "Submodel Options" "AVR Options"
I can find same paragraph without "@tie{}" tags:
'avrxmega7'
"XMEGA" devices wi
Thanks for taking your time to report this issue and help making Ubuntu
better.
I see the strange tags here too, and they are also present in the
manpage on Ubuntu Vivid.
>`info gcc` doesn't have such tags, so looks like this is a bug of
converting original GCC documentation to manpage format.
C