[Bug 1447858] Re: OSD weight should be the TB capacity of the drive

2015-11-03 Thread James Page
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447858 Title: OSD weight should be the TB capacity of the drive To manage

[Bug 1447858] Re: OSD weight should be the TB capacity of the drive

2015-11-03 Thread James Page
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447858 Title: OSD weight should be the TB capacity of the drive To

[Bug 1447858] Re: OSD weight should be the TB capacity of the drive

2015-09-04 Thread Chris Holcombe
James - Yeah I ran that prestart command on my local box. It's showing the .001 per GB capacity. That's more accurate than I was going for which is great. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1447858] Re: OSD weight should be the TB capacity of the drive

2015-09-04 Thread Chris Holcombe
James - Yeah I ran that prestart command on my local box. It's showing the .001 per GB capacity. That's more accurate than I was going for which is great. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1447858] Re: OSD weight should be the TB capacity of the drive

2015-09-04 Thread James Page
Chris - can you confirm that this is actually a problem in a unbalanced server configuration? - I think things should be working OK already. ** Also affects: ceph (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: ceph

[Bug 1447858] Re: OSD weight should be the TB capacity of the drive

2015-09-04 Thread James Page
Chris - can you confirm that this is actually a problem in a unbalanced server configuration? - I think things should be working OK already. ** Also affects: ceph (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: ceph