We could also wait till a bug has ten or so "me too"'s like bug 846374
(which is also about discoverability).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1474226
Title:
[system settings] "Other vi
Fair enough, Won’t Fix was hasty. Marking as Incomplete, because there
isn’t enough information to determine that there’s a problem. Even if
you took a long time to find the settings (which isn’t clear from the
bug description), moving or renaming them might not improve things for
people on average
This is theoretically a simple naming problem, but I know naming
problems are difficult to resolve.
I don't think it's appropriate to say "Won't Fix". If you look at the
bug description alone it's quite obviously a discoverability problem
that needs fixing (somehow).
--
You received this bug not
Thanks for this report. It’s true that putting vibration settings in a
category called “Sound” seems awkward. However, that doesn’t mean
there’s a better place to put them. There are good reasons to put them
with sound settings, and bad reasons to put them in other places
suggested.
Fairly often,
** No longer affects: ubuntu-ux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1474226
Title:
[system settings] "Other vibrations" setting is misclassified. Found
it under "Sound".
To manage notif
** Summary changed:
- "Other vibrations" setting is misclassified. Found it under "Sound".
+ [system settings] "Other vibrations" setting is misclassified. Found it under
"Sound".
** Changed in: ubuntu-ux
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: ubuntu-ux
Importance: Undecided => Medium