[Bug 1475612] Re: ubuntu-push ftbfs with GCC 5

2016-10-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for ubuntu-push (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: ubuntu-push (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1475612] Re: ubuntu-push ftbfs with GCC 5

2016-08-17 Thread Jonas G. Drange
** Changed in: ubuntu-push (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-15.07 => None -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475612 Title: ubuntu-push ftbfs with GCC 5 To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1475612] Re: ubuntu-push ftbfs with GCC 5

2016-08-17 Thread Jonas G. Drange
Is this bug still valid? We've built countless ubuntu-push debs from source this last year. Is that not on GCC5? ** Changed in: ubuntu-push (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete ** Changed in: ubuntu-push (Ubuntu) Assignee: John Lenton (chipaca) => (unassigned) -- You received

[Bug 1475612] Re: ubuntu-push ftbfs with GCC 5

2015-09-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I think https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-push/+bug/1478742 is a more appropriate bug (although that doesn't have an ubuntu component). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475612 Title:

[Bug 1475612] Re: ubuntu-push ftbfs with GCC 5

2015-09-04 Thread Barry Warsaw
I'm seeing FTBFS in the Python 3.5 as default PPA, and confirmed with a local build of ubuntu-push 0.68+15.10.20150814.1-0ubuntu1. I don't think the failures are specifically Python 3.5 related. Here is a link to the py35 PPA buildlog:

[Bug 1475612] Re: ubuntu-push ftbfs with GCC 5

2015-07-31 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~chipaca/ubuntu-push/promises-schmromises -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475612 Title: ubuntu-push ftbfs with GCC 5 To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1475612] Re: ubuntu-push ftbfs with GCC 5

2015-07-31 Thread Pat McGowan
Can you check that this also fixes issues in the dupes ** Changed in: ubuntu-push (Ubuntu) Assignee: Pat McGowan (pat-mcgowan) = John Lenton (chipaca) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1475612] Re: ubuntu-push ftbfs with GCC 5

2015-07-31 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 1/08/2015 5:25 am, Pat McGowan pat.mcgo...@canonical.com wrote: Can you check that this also fixes issues in the dupes I don't think the proposed branch will fix the Go 1.5 failures - but that's probably fine, no need to fix everything all at once :-) -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1475612] Re: ubuntu-push ftbfs with GCC 5

2015-07-30 Thread Pat McGowan
** Changed in: ubuntu-push (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Pat McGowan (pat-mcgowan) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475612 Title: ubuntu-push ftbfs with GCC 5 To manage

[Bug 1475612] Re: ubuntu-push ftbfs with GCC 5

2015-07-30 Thread John Lenton
From a quick look at the build log it seems to not be related to gcc5 but to dbus? I'm not sure whether that is the case really, but it's possible some other change in the stack has done this; push hasn't been rebuilt since april afaict. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1475612] Re: ubuntu-push ftbfs with GCC 5

2015-07-19 Thread Matthias Klose
now down to test failures with new mir https://launchpadlibrarian.net/212039545/buildlog_ubuntu-wily-amd64.ubuntu-push_0.68%2B15.04.20150430.1-0ubuntu2~gcc5.1_BUILDING.txt.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.