[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2019-04-17 Thread Ubuntu QA Website
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker. A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/1523194 ** Tags added: iso-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2019-04-17 Thread Pierre Equoy
** Tags added: ce-qa-concern disco -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523194 Title: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2019-04-17 Thread Pierre Equoy
Just as a follow-up, if I use the following partitioning, the installation completes: /dev/sda: - EFI partition: 128 MB - unencrypted root (/) formatted in ext4: 31 GB /dev/sdb: - encrypted volume hosting home partition (/home) formatted in ext4: 500 GB (basically, only /home on the HDD is

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2019-04-17 Thread Pierre Equoy
I'm facing a similar (if not the same) issue. My laptop has the following hardware: - 500 GB HDD (TOSHIBA MQ01ACF050 (AV002D)) (/dev/sda) - 32 GB SSD (LITEON LST-32S9G-11 SATA 32GB (ZS2110B)) (/dev/sdb) I'm trying to install Ubuntu 19.04 on it as follow, using disk encryption: /dev/sda: - EFI

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-02-08 Thread Phillip Susi
Trust me, I have identified the whole of the problem after enabling full trace of the relevant scripts and going through the logs with a fine tooth comb. The bug is not *in* Ubiquity therefore it is incorrect to leave it tasked there. The Ubiquity developers do not need to know about it as they

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-02-05 Thread GizmoChicken
Phillip, You've identified part of the problem. And I thank you for that. But I'm not convinced that you have identified the whole problem. In addition to assigning the bug to partman-crypto, please leave the bug assigned to ubiquity so that others can find the bug and provide additional

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-02-04 Thread Phillip Susi
The bug isn't in ubiquity, which is why I reassigned it. ** No longer affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523194 Title: Can't install /home into separate

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-02-03 Thread GizmoChicken
** Also affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523194

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-02-02 Thread Phillip Susi
** Package changed: ubiquity (Ubuntu) => partman-crypto (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523194 Title: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume To manage

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-02-02 Thread Phillip Susi
No, I don't work for Canonical. I was able to reproduce this and it looks like the problem is that only one of the two volumes is being formatted and the other has no filesystem in it. I'll try to do some tracing and see where it is going wrong but it certainly looks like a bug in one of the

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-02-02 Thread Phillip Susi
Bingo! /lib/partman/init.d/52crypto: IN: NEW_LABEL =dev=mapper=xvda5_crypt loop parted_server: Read command: NEW_LABEL parted_server: command_new_label() parted_server: Note =dev=mapper=xvda5_crypt as changed parted_server: Opening outfifo parted_server: command_new_label: requested label with

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-02-01 Thread GizmoChicken
Phillip, When I originally reported the bag back on 2015-12-06, the installer did, in fact, hang during installation when the following was displayed: “Creating ext4 system for /home in partition #1 of Encrypted volume (sda3_crypt)...” But as I wrote in Comment #9, the screen shot uploaded with

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-02-01 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523194 Title: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume To manage

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-02-01 Thread Phillip Susi
Ahh, it also shows that contrary to what you said before, the install did not hang during "creating ext4 system..." but has popped up an error dialog saying it was unable to mount the volume. Please attach /var/log/syslog once this has happened. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-01-28 Thread GizmoChicken
Phillip, I tried to install the most current daily build (2016-01-28) of Ubuntu 16.04 into /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume, this time using QEMU/KVM. The attached screen shot was taken just after the installation failed. On this attempt, the error differs somewhat what I observed when

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-01-28 Thread GizmoChicken
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523194 Title: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume To

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-01-27 Thread Phillip Susi
Why do you think this is not a duplicate of #1361951? When it is hung, can you check with ps or the task manager to see if you have the mke2fs process running? If so, run sudo gdb -p and at the prompt, give it a "bt" command and post its output. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-01-18 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
Please: 1. Into the tag list, write down the first name of each release where you are seeing this bug. 2. Set this bug status back to "confirmed". Thank you. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-01-18 Thread GizmoChicken
I started report at Bug #1531387 to expand on comment #1 above. I don't know what, if any, relation Bug #1531387 has to the current bug, but here's a summary of Bug #1531387: 1) Installing root (/) into an Ext4 formatted LUKS partition creates /dev/dm-0, rather than /dev/mapper/sdaX_crypt. 2)

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-01-18 Thread GizmoChicken
** Tags added: wily ** Tags added: xenial ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523194 Title: Can't install /home

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-01-18 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523194 Title: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume To manage

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-01-16 Thread GizmoChicken
This bug may also be related to Bug #1361951 related to mke2fs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523194 Title: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume To manage

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-01-16 Thread GizmoChicken
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1361951 mke2fs asks for input when formatting over a partition table -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523194 Title: Can't install /home

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-01-12 Thread Phillip Susi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1361951 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1361951 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1361951 mke2fs asks for input when formatting over a partition table -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2016-01-05 Thread GizmoChicken
This bug may also be related to Bug #1531387. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523194 Title: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume To manage notifications about

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2015-12-28 Thread GizmoChicken
Although perhaps not a "duplicate" of Bug #1509877 (assessed to be a "critical" bug for Lubuntu), this bug and that bug at least seem to be related. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1509877 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2015-12-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523194 Title:

[Bug 1523194] Re: Can't install /home into separate LUKS encrypted volume

2015-12-24 Thread GizmoChicken
I'll just add that, as a workaround, I installed Ubuntu only into boot (/boot) and root (/). I then booted into the installed Ubuntu and created a new auto-mountable LUKS-encrypted volume formatted with Ext4, to which I moved my home directory. The above approach works, but for some reason,