[Bug 1534413] Re: Precise: lockup during fadvise syscall with POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED

2016-06-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for linux (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534413

[Bug 1534413] Re: Precise: lockup during fadvise syscall with POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED

2016-04-05 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Incomplete ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (inaddy) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1534413] Re: Precise: lockup during fadvise syscall with POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED

2016-02-01 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Unfortunately I received 2 other kdumps from the same user and it looks like that other 2 kdumps were happening because of a NULL dereference (3.2.0-79). I asked them to test latest 3.2 kernel + the fix I commented above. User still faced kdumps with latest 3.2 but only with khungtask

[Bug 1534413] Re: Precise: lockup during fadvise syscall with POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED

2016-01-25 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534413 Title:

[Bug 1534413] Re: Precise: lockup during fadvise syscall with POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED

2016-01-14 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Disconsider my previous analysis please. After disassembling carefully the java process dump I could see that we had the instruction pointer at: if (iter.task) put_task_struct(iter.task); Some instructions before a loop that could be a potential candidate for deadlocks, which I was

[Bug 1534413] Re: Precise: lockup during fadvise syscall with POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED

2016-01-14 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Disconsider my previous analysis please. After disassembling carefully the java process dump I could see that we had the instruction pointer at: if (iter.task) put_task_struct(iter.task); Some instructions before a loop that could be a potential candidate for deadlocks, which I was

[Bug 1534413] Re: Precise: lockup during fadvise syscall with POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED

2016-01-14 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Because Precise 3.2.0-79 is missing debug symbols froms ddebs.ubuntu.com I had to compile a 3.2.0-79 kernel in a PPA and expect the symbols to be close to what they used to be in that version. That led me to a wrong initial analysis that I document here for historical purposes: > 178

[Bug 1534413] Re: Precise: lockup during fadvise syscall with POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED

2016-01-14 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Available PPA for testing purposes: https://launchpad.net/~inaddy/+archive/ubuntu/lp1534413 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534413 Title: Precise: lockup during fadvise syscall with