*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1539775 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539775
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1539775
Enable ppc64el on dpdk
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538664
Title:
Please enable ppc64el on dpdk
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
For the moment I have to get x86 tests up and running in a proper way
first before I think doing tests on power on minicloud or similar - so
I'd have to rely on you but would try to guide the bit I can.
>cComment #6, I will do that. Can I forward the one you attached here?
(And I take it is on the
Hello Christian.
I did not reply to some of your comments:
Comment #3, there are some options, in case you want to test on power machines.
One I can think of now is the minicloud [1]. Additionally, I tried running some
things and will post it on another comment, I can run other tests with your
I have downloaded the source of dpdk from ppa, built and installed it
from [2].
Just tried to run a dpdk_proc_info and got the following:
# dpdk_proc_info
EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 1 as core 8 on socket 0
EAL: Support maximum 128 logical core(s) by configura
Fernando, did you manage to test dpdk provided by Christian in his PPA?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538664
Title:
Please enable ppc64el on dpdk
To manage notifications about this
Hi Christian.
You were really quick and forward on checking this, thanks a lot!
My apologies for not giving the proper editing and details on the patch,
but I really did not hope to get the file I sent itself to be applied. I
didn't think it was ideal really.
I believe we can give you that commi
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538664
Title:
Please enable ppc64el on dpdk
To manage notifications about this bug go t
So to summarize, this is now available for testing in the ppa.
But there are a few things to keep in mind.
We plan to put dpdk in main in 16.04, so enabling ppc64el implicates some kind
of commitment.
But to get it enabled in 16.04 you (IBM) and the taco-team really have to work
out how stable,
It is a patch, but not a debdiff to sponsor - I can't remove the sponsor
Team - whoever can feel free to do so.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538664
Title:
Please enable ppc64el on
The attachment "debdiff including ppc64el architecture" seems to be a
debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report
so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the
attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the
attachment, remove the
Hi,
I finished modifying your changes for integration.
A few minor hickups, but nothing severe.
I'll attach the final diff that made it for your re-review if you like.
There is a ppa which allows you to test dpdk-2.2 on ppc64el at
https://launchpad.net/~paelzer/+archive/ubuntu/dpdk-merge-2.2
--
** Patch added: "forward ported (dpdk 2.2) enablement of ppc64el"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1538664/+attachment/4558303/+files/dpdk-2.2-lp-1538664.diff
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => In Progress
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Unde
I also restructured the patch to only handle the CFLAGS (small and readable)
and added the moving of the config file to d/rules as a "mv".
That way the patch will apply more reliably when upstream changes to your file
come in some day.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Also would you mind to get that diff to mk/machine/default/rte.vars.mk
upstream in the long term?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538664
Title:
Please enable ppc64el on dpdk
To manag
Hi Fernando, FYI it will certainly be DPDK 2.2 in 16.04
I have no power machines at the moment to give it a test on my own.
I'll review your debdiff, try to port it to the stream of DPDK 2.2 we have and
see if it builds.
If it does would you be able to give it some testing and give it IBMs
"bles
First I see your patch debian/patches/ppc64-dpdk.patch has no reasonable
header, but never mind I'll add one
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538664
Title:
Please enable ppc64el on dpd
I will create a feature request for this one.
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538664
Title:
Please enable ppc64el on dpdk
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Taco Screen team (taco-screen-team)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538664
Title:
Please enable ppc64el on dpdk
To manage
19 matches
Mail list logo
