The Debian package will keep a Recommends. This package requires the
Google pepperflashplugins. The fact that pepperflashplugin-nonfree can
be avoided by manually installing it explains why this is a Recommends
instead of a Depends (i.e. users that really want can avoid the
installation of
Makes sense. Now we need an Ubuntu MOTU maintainer to take a look at
this. I can't offer to put the alternative in place myself, it is beyond
my skills (one day hopefully).
> One should also probably check that there are proper Conflicts/Replaces
> between pepperflashplugin-nonfree and
> I don't know if [having two PPAPI Flash plugins] is that much of a
problem
Come to think of it, it is: the one browser-plugin-freshplayer-
pepperflash recommends, pepperflashplugin-nonfree, must be updated
manually or cronly by sudo update-pepperflashplugin-nonfree --install,
while the one in
