Ran into this same bug using version 0.8.0.3 (Debian Jessie)
Fix for me was to add the following to acng.conf
PfilePatternEx: \.yml.gz$
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547431
Title:
** Changed in: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu Wily)
Assignee: Stefan Bader (smb) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547431
Title:
Does not allow appstream files
To manage
This bug was fixed in the package apt-cacher-ng - 0.7.2-1ubuntu2.2
---
apt-cacher-ng (0.7.2-1ubuntu2.2) precise; urgency=low
* Backport changes needed to support AppStream / DEP-11 (LP: #1547431).
* Backport support for by-hash index files (LP: #1568754).
-- Stefan Bader
This bug was fixed in the package apt-cacher-ng - 0.7.26-1ubuntu0.1
---
apt-cacher-ng (0.7.26-1ubuntu0.1) trusty; urgency=medium
[ Rolf Leggewie ]
* backport appstream support from upstream (LP: #1547431).
[Stefan Bader]
* backport support for by-hash index files (LP:
This bug was fixed in the package apt-cacher-ng - 0.8.5-1ubuntu0.1
---
apt-cacher-ng (0.8.5-1ubuntu0.1) wily; urgency=low
* Support dep11/appstream files (LP: #1547431)
* Support by-hash index files (LP: #1568754).
* Also dropped "single-debian-patch" and "auto-commit" from
Verified again for Precise and Wily as well.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done-precise verification-done-wily
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547431
Thanks for preparing this fix. I can confirm that the version of apt-
cacher-ng in trusty-proposed (0.7.26-1ubuntu0.1) permits the downloading
and caching of the appstream files. I'm also able to install and update
packages as before. Marking verificaition-done for trusty.
** Tags added:
Hello Michał, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt-cacher-ng into precise-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-cacher-
ng/0.7.2-1ubuntu2.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
** Changed in: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu Wily)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Stefan Bader (smb)
** Changed in: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu Wily)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu Wily)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because
SRU Justification:
Impact: When a new Xenial installation attempts to update its appstream
cache with an older version of apt-cacher-ng as its apt proxy, it will
fail with error messages about invalid files/locations.
Fix: A small addition to the embedded patterns backported from a newer
version
Not sure about Wily. Potentially it is affected, too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547431
Title:
Does not allow appstream files
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Also affects: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu Wily)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547431
Title:
Does not allow appstream files
To manage
Just to confirm, works fine with Rolf's patch (tested on Trusty). Thanks
Stefan taking away the need to build it myself :-).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547431
Title:
Does not
** Changed in: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547431
Title:
Does not allow appstream files
To manage notifications about
Stefan's assessment of Launchpad's behaviour regarding uploads is
correct. It is not necessary to upload explicitly to -proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547431
Title:
Does
Rolf, I think the upload process was changed back to all supported
releases. Which means it does not matter whether the target is
-proposed or . It will always go via proposed. Since I
did not hear anything back before I prepared both uploads and asked
someone to sponsor (who promptly forgot to,
Stefan, you'd need to upload to precise-proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547431
Title:
Does not allow appstream files
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
For now I uploaded the proposed fix for Trusty and Precise to my testing
PPA (ppa:smb/testing) in case anybody else wants to test without
building the packages on their own.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Rolf, are you able to upload apt-cacher-ng or do we need to add
sponsors, too? (Because I cannot upload).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547431
Title:
Does not allow appstream files
** Changed in: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu Trusty)
** Also affects: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Verified the proposed Trusty patch by setting up a Trusty VM for apt-cacher-ng,
then removing the dep11 data (rm /var/lib/apt/lists/*dep11*) from the apt
cache, setting the http proxy to the VM and then running apt-get update.
With the current Trusty version, appstream files fail (403 error) and
Rolf, I took the minimal changes and prepared a Precise version of it.
Have been testing that on my box which still (no, don't ask) runs
Precise and the update of a Xenial desktop succeeded after that being
installed.
** Patch added: "proposed-precise-sru.debdiff"
Michał, can you compile a package with this patch and see if the problem
is fixed for you? If upstream is fixed then this should do it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547431
Title:
attaching untested patch for trusty
** Patch added: "proposed SRU fix for trusty"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-cacher-ng/+bug/1547431/+attachment/4586549/+files/LP1547431.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
For those who wonder (because of the lack of informative comments for
standard _users_...) the fix has been released in upstream version
0.8.8.
Ref. : https://alioth.debian.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p
=apt-cacher-ng/apt-cacher-
It is the correct repository and far from being ancient. You just need
to focus on the right branch, see debian/gbp.conf for details.
I will add some Vcs links though. Actually I thought I already had done
that before and never bothered to review debian/control in the last
couple of years :-).
Eduard, come on, you only uploaded the fix two months ago. Thanks for
the fix, though. I will mark this as fix released for xenial, Michał
already requested a backport to trusty.
Eduard, it would be nice if you set the Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser
variables in debian/control so that the information
Ancient version. There is a fix in Debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547431
Title:
Does not allow appstream files
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
29 matches
Mail list logo
