Appears to be working ok now. thanks for the hard work brian and martin!
:)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624641
Title:
security updates with a new dependency don't get installed
T
This bug was fixed in the package unattended-upgrades - 0.92ubuntu1.1
---
unattended-upgrades (0.92ubuntu1.1) yakkety; urgency=medium
* Modify data/50unattended-upgrades.Ubuntu such that the release pocket is
an allowed origin so that security updates with a new dependency will
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://192.168.10.7/ubuntu yakkety-proposed/main amd64
unattended-upgrades all 0.92ubuntu1.1 [33.4 kB]
Fetched 33.4 kB in 0s (582 kB/s)
The system does not support apt-btrfs-snapshot
Preconfiguring packages ...
(
Hello Jarno, or anyone else affected,
Accepted unattended-upgrades into yakkety-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/unattended-upgrades/0.92ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
I think it would be wise to run a regression analysis on all previous
patches across all packages where, similarly, patches failed to apply
and were not caught by dutifully diligent security-minded persons. i
would suspect you have thousands of failed applications of patches
across the board. a sim
I've reuploaded this to the Yakkety queue for review as the patch was
not properly applied to the package because the package's source format
was native not quilt. The new upload does not use quilt and just
modifies the file directly.
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Sta
Still present, or new issue due to the changes?
"""
$ apt-cache policy unattended-upgrades
unattended-upgrades:
Installed: 0.92ubuntu1
"""
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624641
Titl
This is a regression. I tested latest updates and still having issues,
albeit slightly different. Not sure if exactly the same bug and not sure
if this is really a duplicate, as currently linked. But it should be
checked out.
Bug #1638561
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
This bug was fixed in the package unattended-upgrades - 0.90ubuntu0.1
---
unattended-upgrades (0.90ubuntu0.1) xenial-proposed; urgency=medium
* Modify data/50unattended-upgrades.Ubuntu such that the release pocket is
an allowed origin so that security updates with a new dependen
bdmurray@clean-xenial-amd64:~$ apt-cache policy unattended-upgrades
unattended-upgrades:
Installed: 0.90ubuntu0.1
Candidate: 0.90ubuntu0.1
Version table:
*** 0.90ubuntu0.1 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
0.90 500
500 http://192.168.10.7/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages
Hello Jarno, or anyone else affected,
Accepted unattended-upgrades into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/unattended-upgrades/0.90ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
This bug was fixed in the package unattended-upgrades - 0.92ubuntu1
---
unattended-upgrades (0.92ubuntu1) yakkety; urgency=medium
* Add debian/patches/enable-release-pocket.patch which sets the release
pocket as an allowed origin so that security updates with a new dependency
** Description changed:
- E.g. chromium-browser has an update, but U-U does not update it. I saw
- in update-manager that the security update is available before running
- U-U. Afterwards I can install the update by update-manager.
+ Test Case
+ -
+ 1) Boot a xenial system w/o chromium bro
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624641
Title:
security updates with a new dependency d
** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notifica
Is it possible to relax these rules without also bringing in apt-get
dist-upgrade's unfortunate ability to uninstall packages when it thinks
that's the shortest solution? We've seen cases where dist-upgrade
sometimes tries to remove sudo or the signed shim.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notifi
** Summary changed:
- Does not install all security updates
+ security updates with a new dependency don't get installed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624641
Title:
security update
19 matches
Mail list logo
