[Bug 1634867] Re: Memory leak in DownloadJobImpl

2016-12-18 Thread Michi Henning
This is in part related to some of the leaks: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/12220 We are still compiling with BOOST_THREAD_VERSION=4, which might prevent the boost fix from being effective. (Need to check both xenial and zesty.) ** Bug watch added: Boost Trac #12220

[Bug 1634867] Re: Memory leak in DownloadJobImpl

2016-10-21 Thread James Henstridge
Before classifying this as a definite leak, it'd be good to work out some way to return control to the event loop for some period after this clean-up. Cancelling a job is potentially an asynchronous operation, so the future returned by cancel() needs to be kept alive until the future is ready. We