[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-08-10 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Peter, or anyone else affected, Accepted python-acme into zesty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python- acme/0.14.2-0ubuntu0.17.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-08-02 Thread Peter Eckersley
@racb the exception document looks good to me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640978 Title: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-07-31 Thread Brian Murray
@brad - lsb_release -c returns just the codename so if you use that you could remove the pipe to grep. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640978 Title: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-07-28 Thread Robie Basak
I also welcome anyone to comment on this plan or my proposed exception documentation at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/Certbot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640978

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-07-28 Thread Robie Basak
Thanks Brad! Based on this, and our conversations on IRC, I've prepared documentation for an SRU policy exception at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/Certbot Rather than mandate use of your script, I tried to write it so that it's the outcomes that are mandated, and linked to the

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-07-19 Thread Brad Warren
Sorry for the 2nd message. I just noticed I missed the shebang line when I copied my script and having `set -e` is important. I was using `#!/bin/bash -xe`. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-07-19 Thread Brad Warren
Below is a draft of the instructions for how to run integration tests on the proposed Certbot packages. Two comments about this script: 1. I'm not sure if there's a better way to get the Ubuntu codename or how reliable the method I'm using is. 2. I don't know if the way I'm installing the

Re: [Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-07-14 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Robie Basak <1640...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:30:14PM -, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> The logic of the scripts seems sound to me. Do you want me to do the >> individual reviews of each branch as well in this case? > > Could you

Re: [Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-07-12 Thread Robie Basak
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:30:14PM -, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > The logic of the scripts seems sound to me. Do you want me to do the > individual reviews of each branch as well in this case? Could you review what I put in the branches, please? That is: that the backport contents are suitable

Re: [Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-07-12 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Robie Basak <1640...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I've prepared backport branches for 0.14.2 for Xenial, Yakkety and Zesty > against python-acme, python-certbot, python-certbot-apache and python- > certbot-nginx. That's 12 branches. There are an additional 2

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-07-07 Thread Robie Basak
I've prepared backport branches for 0.14.2 for Xenial, Yakkety and Zesty against python-acme, python-certbot, python-certbot-apache and python- certbot-nginx. That's 12 branches. There are an additional 2 branches that handle the source package renames in Xenial. I've pushed all of these to Alioth

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-06-02 Thread Peter Eckersley
Also, a more generic template for any future SRUs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oQOV_kw-gs0ZeNFLyd- nIzpsaoMW5zMLlooaQkoKnF0/edit -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640978 Title:

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-06-02 Thread Peter Eckersley
The updated SRU request documentation is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mhmBt6umfdWEqvvnc17ILl5xbW4xSLlFhEG85ZAUYhg/edit -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640978 Title:

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-05-24 Thread Peter Eckersley
The Certbot team has had a couple of calls with rbasak to sort out progress on this. Lask week we met and concluded that we should SRU 0.14.1 because it's well-tested and has additional bugfixes, as well as creating a streamlined process for the Certbot team to get well-tested releases SRU'd

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

2017-05-24 Thread Peter Eckersley
** Summary changed: - [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.9.3 + [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640978 Title: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1 To manage