[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2018-07-18 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Debian) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644975 Title: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails To manage notifications

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2018-05-09 Thread Dirk F
In the related bug #1763611, it is concluded that the Ubiquity installer incorrectly set up /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume to reference a non-existent disk UUID, causing a 30-40s delay in startup. Surely that file is obsolete (because it doesn't help resume from swapfile, eg) and should be

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2018-05-09 Thread Andrej Shadura
@superm1, your fix makes the boot process very slow on one of the machines, it takes a minute or more for it to time out waiting for the resume device. People also complain here: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1013830/slow- boot-long-kernel-load-time-due-to-wrong-resume-device -- You received

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2018-04-19 Thread Dirk F
If the swapfile is available as the initrd is handing over to the real system, then it should work (in Bionic and fixed versions back probably beyond Xenial). What would happen is something like this: - Grub[2] is loaded from yr /boot, an unencrypted partition or perhaps a USB stick - Grub

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2018-04-07 Thread Steve
Does this mean that hibernation + swapfile + LUKS encryption will work on bionic? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644975 Title: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails To manage

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2018-02-23 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Debian) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644975 Title: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails To manage notifications

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2018-02-21 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644975 Title: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails To manage notifications about

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2018-02-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package initramfs-tools - 0.130ubuntu3 --- initramfs-tools (0.130ubuntu3) bionic; urgency=medium * Fix resuming a hibernate session from a swapfile (LP: #1644975) -- Mario Limonciello Tue, 20 Feb 2018 15:34:46 -0600 **

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2018-02-20 Thread Mario Limonciello
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #890950 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890950 ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Debian) Importance: Undecided => Unknown ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Debian) Status: New => Unknown ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Debian)

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2018-02-20 Thread Mario Limonciello
Thanks for those of you who added the various patches for this. I've updated them relative to 0.130 and i'm uploading them to bionic. I've also submitted a bug to Debian with the patch for this (but I haven't gotten the BTS email yet). ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2017-10-02 Thread Dirk F
In the latest upstream version 0.130 , the faulty script has been rewritten, with supporting sourced scripts. Perhaps a better solution would be for Ubuntu to pull in this version, and repackage it for

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2017-10-01 Thread Dirk F
Bug 983805 also applies to the /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local- premount/resume script. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644975 Title: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails To

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2017-10-01 Thread Dirk F
** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644975 Title: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails To manage

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2017-10-01 Thread Dirk F
Reviewing the patch from bug 554009, I have the following comments: - as the patch sets SWAPTYPE, no need to set it in line 24 of the original script immediately before the patch: just run wait-for-root (if that is actually needed); - the test for $resume_offset would be safer if it looked for a

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2017-05-30 Thread Wladimir Palant
I can confirm that the following statement in https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SwapFaq#Why_do_I_need_swap.3F is wrong: > The hibernation implementation currently used in Ubuntu, swsusp, needs a swap or suspend partition. It cannot use a swap file on an active file system. In fact, swsusp

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2016-12-25 Thread Ryo Onodera
Hi! Some time passed... Will this bug be addressed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644975 Title: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2016-12-07 Thread Ryo Onodera
I'm marking this status to confirmed because this is a re-open of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/554009 ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is