[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-07-13 Thread Steve Langasek
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1679435 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679435 If this is gnome-software, then this should be fixed already in gnome- software 3.20.1+git20170427.0.3d09239-0ubuntu1~xenial1 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1679435 GNOME Software fails

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-07-07 Thread MAYANK SHUKLA
** Description changed: During a software upgrade, process was stuck on php7.0-xml configuration for 20 minutes, after that I killed the process. I am not sure what additional info are required, will be happy to provide any. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package:

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-06-27 Thread Brian Murray
Actually, I'm not convinced that update-manager is the front end in use here. If we look at the JournalErrors.txt file attached to this bug we can see the following: dic 02 09:33:40 hostname org.debian.apt[871]: 09:33:40 AptDaemon [INFO]: Initializing daemon dic 02 09:33:40 hostname

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-05-26 Thread Colin Watson
** Changed in: php7.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: debconf (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-05-26 Thread siddharth chaubey
** Changed in: php7.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: debconf (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-05-21 Thread Mikkel Kirkgaard Nielsen
This happened to me yesterday on a 16.04 desktop system using update- manager. Apparently failed during setup of package unattended-upgrades. Below is apt/history.log, apt/term.log, ps and debconf version taken while the GUI has been hanging (greyed out and unresponsive) for ~15 hours. GUI

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646739 Title: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-05-10 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: php7.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed ** Changed in: debconf (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-05-09 Thread mohamed mahmoud sakr
** Changed in: debconf (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Committed ** Changed in: php7.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Committed ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Committed ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-04-10 Thread Nish Aravamudan
@Alberto, why did you mark the samba task critical? As far as I can tell, there is no bug in samba itself, all of these bugs are in update-manager and just have been seen with various binary packages which we're marking this bug and then indicating they are invalid. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-04-10 Thread Nish Aravamudan
@Alberto, why did you mark the samba task critical? As far as I can tell, there is no bug in samba itself, all of these bugs are in update-manager and just have been seen with various binary packages which we're marking this bug and then indicating they are invalid. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-04-10 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646739 Title: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager To manage

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-04-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646739 Title:

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-03-31 Thread ChristianEhrhardt
FYI as nacc asked, I added samba task to reflect that it showed up there as well (I dupped another case onto this). ** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-03-28 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: rls-aa-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646739 Title: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-03-13 Thread Nish Aravamudan
@es20490446e: how can you have a Critical Invalid bug? Also, "Critical" is listed as "Fix now or as soon as possible". Except we don't have a reproducible test case and there is a fairly easy workaround (and probably most server users are actually unaffected by this as they are GUI-free). This

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-03-12 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: php7.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Critical ** Changed in: debconf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: php7.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in:

[Bug 1646739] Re: "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager

2017-03-09 Thread Nish Aravamudan
** Summary changed: - package php7.0-xml 7.0.13-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128 + "Use of uninitialized value" in debconf via update-manager -- You received this bug notification because you are a member