[Bug 1646927] Re: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

2017-02-10 Thread Tiago Stürmer Daitx
** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2016-2183 ** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2016-5546 ** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2016-5547 ** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-

[Bug 1646927] Re: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

2017-02-09 Thread Tiago Stürmer Daitx
** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2016-5549 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646927 Title: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized

[Bug 1646927] Re: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

2017-01-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package openjdk-8 - 8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.10.2 --- openjdk-8 (8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.10.2) yakkety-security; urgency=medium * debian/buildwatch.sh: updated to stop it if no 'make' process is running, as it probably means that the build failed -

[Bug 1646927] Re: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

2017-01-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package openjdk-8 - 8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.04.2 --- openjdk-8 (8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.04.2) xenial-security; urgency=medium * Backport to 16.04. openjdk-8 (8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.10.2) yakkety-security; urgency=medium * debian/buildwatch.sh: updated to

[Bug 1646927] Re: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

2017-01-17 Thread Gustavo Romero
Sorry, I didn't understand your point. The patch is already on 9 and 8u upstream. Could you clarify please? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646927 Title: PPC64: Poor StrictMath

[Bug 1646927] Re: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

2017-01-10 Thread Matthias Klose
could these be proposed for an upstream backport? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646927 Title: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation To manage

[Bug 1646927] Re: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

2016-12-02 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Taco Screen team (taco-screen-team) => Tiago Stürmer Daitx (tdaitx) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646927 Title: PPC64: Poor

[Bug 1646927] Re: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

2016-12-02 Thread Gustavo Romero
Yes, absolutely. I'll request it and update this bug. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646927 Title: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation To

[Bug 1646927] Re: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

2016-12-02 Thread Matthias Klose
would it be possible to propose this patch upstream for backporting to jdk8u? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646927 Title: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized