[Bug 164769] Re: problem processing letter

2007-11-25 Thread Chris Conway
I apologize for missing this, Norbert. But I'm sure I don't know why you have to be rude about it. As you may know, LaTeX errors are not always easy to interpret... I confirm that adding the second argument fixes the problem. Perhaps we should change this to Wishlist: Missing command arguments

Re: [Bug 164769] Re: problem processing letter

2007-11-25 Thread Norbert Preining
On So, 25 Nov 2007, Chris Conway wrote: I apologize for missing this, Norbert. But I'm sure I don't know why you have to be rude about it. As you may know, LaTeX errors are not always easy to interpret... www.google.com latex letter I'm feeling lucky Is this a lot to

[Bug 164769] Re: problem processing letter

2007-11-25 Thread Michael Bienia
Setting this bug to Invalid as this is not a bug. ** Changed in: texlive-base (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- problem processing letter https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164769 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for

[Bug 164769] Re: problem processing letter

2007-11-23 Thread Chris Conway
** Attachment added: .log file for problematic example http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10537855/foo.log -- problem processing letter https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164769 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. --