[Bug 1661843] Re: dkms_packages.py crashed with AttributeError in __main__: module 'apport.fileutils' has no attribute 'make_report_path'

2017-02-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package dkms - 2.3-3 --- dkms (2.3-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Upstream post-2.3 cherry-picks for apport (LP: #1661843) -- Aron Xu Tue, 07 Feb 2017 23:27:25 +0800 ** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu Zesty) Status: Triaged => Fix

[Bug 1661843] Re: dkms_packages.py crashed with AttributeError in __main__: module 'apport.fileutils' has no attribute 'make_report_path'

2017-02-07 Thread Aron Xu
There are 3 patches missing, they are committed to upstream HEAD, though: https://github.com/dell/dkms/commit/3247bd12399a9500d5caa32ac55f071996514024 https://github.com/dell/dkms/commit/b7a8dcb84e36d8037a1a8a92f7e5262f769ce13b

[Bug 1661843] Re: dkms_packages.py crashed with AttributeError in __main__: module 'apport.fileutils' has no attribute 'make_report_path'

2017-02-06 Thread Brian Murray
Specifically, at least this change was lost. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/219224401/dkms_2.2.0.3-1.1ubuntu5.14.04.4_2.2.0.3-1.1ubuntu5.14.04.5.diff.gz There may have been more changes to dkms_apport.py that disappeared too though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1661843] Re: dkms_packages.py crashed with AttributeError in __main__: module 'apport.fileutils' has no attribute 'make_report_path'

2017-02-06 Thread Brian Murray
This is a regression of the fix for bug 1499842, the merge from debian overwrote dkms_apport.py and now it is back to its state from before bug 1499842 was fixed. ** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Aron Xu (happyaron) ** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu) Status: New =>

[Bug 1661843] Re: dkms_packages.py crashed with AttributeError in __main__: module 'apport.fileutils' has no attribute 'make_report_path'

2017-02-04 Thread Apport retracing service
This crash has the same stack trace characteristics as bug #1499842. However, the latter was already fixed in an earlier package version than the one in this report. This might be a regression or because the problem is in a dependent package. ** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check ** Changed in: