Re: [Bug 1670060] [NEW] Not obvious when a snap is installed with --classic

2017-03-05 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Ah, I wonder if this is an interaction between a snap that asks for classic mode, and a snap that gets TOLD to be in classic mode. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670060 Title: Not ob

Re: [Bug 1670060] [NEW] Not obvious when a snap is installed with --classic

2017-03-05 Thread James Troup
Mark Shuttleworth <1670...@bugs.launchpad.net> writes: > It's in the 'Notes' column in 2.23, not sure if it was there in previous > versions. Hmm, it's not for me... james@malefic:~$ snap list | grep keepassxc keepassxc2.1.35 keepassxreboot - james@malefi

Re: [Bug 1670060] [NEW] Not obvious when a snap is installed with --classic

2017-03-05 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
It's in the 'Notes' column in 2.23, not sure if it was there in previous versions. mark@maas:~$ snap list Name Version Rev Developer Notes canonical-livepatch 721canonical - conjure-up 2.1.1107 canonical classic core 16-2 1337

[Bug 1670060] [NEW] Not obvious when a snap is installed with --classic

2017-03-04 Thread James Troup
Public bug reported: I installed a snap with --classic and was surprised to find there's no evidence that the snap is in classic mode in either 'snap info' or 'snap list'. Additionally, the classic mode snap appears in the output of 'snap interfaces' which seems misleading. Given a snap installe