--- Comment From sbobr...@au1.ibm.com 2017-07-20 01:32 EDT---
(In reply to comment #17)
> as mentioned by Sam but I could not see any difference with/without it.
> Maybe it is needed for a specific scenario.
That's expected. It just resolves a race condition that can produce a
spurious in
--- Comment From alin...@br.ibm.com 2017-07-07 09:49 EDT---
I could confirm it is already working on QEMU 2.9 + P9 support patches.
I also have added the commit
229e16fd247c7d39822627916d18b52f733cbfa1 ppc/xics: preserve P and Q
bits for KVM IRQs
as mentioned by Sam but I could not
--- Comment From bren...@br.ibm.com 2017-06-01 11:04 EDT---
Canonical,
This is the Qemu patch we are talking about:
229e16fd247c7d39822627916d18b52f733cbfa1 ppc/xics: preserve P and Q
bits for KVM IRQs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
--- Comment From lagar...@br.ibm.com 2017-05-23 12:20 EDT---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Hi,
> thanks for starting the tracking of all related changes.
> Is this in qemu 2.9, if not is it at least upstream and which are the
> related commits?
POWER9 support will come with QEMU 2.10. Sam, co